World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Mark Kelman

Article Id: WHEBN0030722580
Reproduction Date:

Title: Mark Kelman  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Law and economics, Stanford Law School
Collection: 1951 Births, American Legal Scholars, Living People, People from New York City, Philosophers of Law, Stanford Law School Faculty
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia

Mark Kelman

Mark Kelman (born August 20, 1951) is jurist and vice dean of Stanford Law School. As a prominent legal scholar, he has applied social science methodologies, including economics and psychology, to the study of law. He is one of the most cited law professors.[1] He is regarded as one of the co-founders of the critical legal studies movement and authored "A Guide to Critical Legal Studies." He is widely known for his influential[2] 1978 critique of the Coase theorem,[3] a core part of law and economics.


  • Narrative 1
  • Rational rhetoricism 2
  • See also 3
  • Publications 4
  • References 5
  • External links 6


Being a published novelist, Kelman is well aware of the role of narrative in forming a sense of personal identity[4] - as also of the way narratives may be incriminating or exculpatory, depending on the time frame used.[5]

Thus, for example, when viewed in a long enough time-frame, a criminal act which appears at first sight the result of individual responsibility may, Kelman suggests, be instead the deterministic result of socio-economic conditions.[6]

Rational rhetoricism

Kelman argues that much in the law involves providing rational interpretative constructs that surround a non-rational core – what he terms 'rational rhetoricism'[7] with the result that, in his words, β€œIt is illuminating and disquieting to see that we are nonrationally constructing the legal world over and over again....”.[8]

Stanley Fish has proposed in rebuttal that such rhetorical constructs are in fact a necessary aspect of the human condition, and thus an inevitable facet of the legal world as well.[9]

See also


  • Mark Kelman, What Followed Was Pure Lesley (1973)
  • Mark Kelman, 'Choice & Utility' Wisconsin Law Review 1979 (1979)
  • Mark Kelman, 'Interpretive Construction in the Substantive Criminal Law' Stanford Law Review (1981)


  1. ^
  2. ^
  3. ^
  4. ^ Robin West, Narrative, Authority, and Law (1993) p. 254
  5. ^ G. Binder/R. Weisberg, Literary Criticism of Law (2000) p. 264
  6. ^ Stanley Fish, Doing What Comes Naturally (1989) p. 393-7
  7. ^ Fish, p. 393
  8. ^ Quoted in Fish, p. 395
  9. ^ Fish, p. 395-6

External links

  • Mark Kelman's biography at Stanford Law School
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.