World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Massimo Pigliucci


Massimo Pigliucci

Massimo Pigliucci
Born (1964-01-16) January 16, 1964
Monrovia, Liberia
Alma mater
School Scientific skepticism
Main interests
Philosophy of science, Philosophy of pseudoscience, Relationship between science and religion

Massimo Pigliucci (Italian pronunciation: ; born January 16, 1964)[1] is Professor of Philosophy at CUNY-City College,[2] formerly co-host of the Rationally Speaking Podcast,[3] and formerly the editor in chief for the online magazine Scientia Salon.[4] He is an outspoken critic of pseudoscience[5][6] and creationism,[7] and an advocate for secularism[8] and science education.[9]


  • Biography 1
  • Critical thinking and scepticism 2
    • Rationally Speaking 2.1
  • Bibliography 3
  • References 4
  • External links 5


Pigliucci was born in Monrovia, Liberia, although he was raised in Rome, Italy.[1] He has a doctorate in genetics from the University of Ferrara, Italy, a Ph.D. in biology from the University of Connecticut, and a Ph.D. in philosophy of science from the University of Tennessee.[10] He is a fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science and of the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry.[1]

Pigliucci was formerly a professor of

  • Plato's Footnote – Pigliucci's Webpage
  • Rationally Speaking – blog by Pigliucci about skepticism and humanism.
  • Dr. Pigliucci's Rationally Speaking Podcast
  • Massimo Pigliucci on Secular Web
  • Philosophy & Theory in Biology

Media related to at Wikimedia Commons

External links

  1. ^ a b c d Massimo Pigliucci — Curriculum Vitae
  2. ^ "Cuny - City College — Philosophy Department". 
  3. ^ "Rationally Speaking Podcast". 
  4. ^ "Scientia Salon". 
  5. ^ Pigliucci, Massimo; Boudry, Maarten, eds. (2013). Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem. University of Chicago Press.  
  6. ^ Pigliucci, Massimo (10 October 2013). "The Dangers of Pseudoscience".  
  7. ^ Pigliucci, Massimo (2002). Denying evolution: Creationism, scientism, and the nature of science. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates. 
  8. ^ a b Secular Coalition for America Advisory Board Biography
  9. ^ a b Pigliucci, M. (2005). "Science and fundamentalism".  
  10. ^ a b "Massimo Pigliucci — Short Bio" (PDF). 
  11. ^ "Massimo Pigliucci — Selected Papers". 
  12. ^ "Society for the Study of Evolution — Description of Awards". 
  13. ^ "Massimo Pigliucci". Committee for Skeptical Inquiry. 
  14. ^ "Rationally Speaking — a blog by Pigliucci about skepticism and humanism". 
  15. ^ Pigliucci, Massimo (2002). Denying evolution: creationism, scientism, and the nature of science. Sunderland, Mass.:  
  16. ^ "Evolution Debate — Pigliucci vs Hovind".  
  17. ^ "CV of William Dembski". Retrieved 1 January 2014. 
  18. ^ "Evolution and Intelligent Design: Pigliucci vs Wells".  
  19. ^ Pigliucci, Massimo (18 August 2008). "Excommunicated by the Atheists!". 
  20. ^ Pigliucci, M. (2013). "New Atheism and the Scientistic Turn in the Atheism Movement" (PDF). Midwest Studies In Philosophy 37 (1): 142–153. 
  21. ^  
  22. ^  
  23. ^ Moreland, J.P. (2013). Debating Christian Theism. USA: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0199755431.
  24. ^ Pigliucci, Massimo (20 September 2013). "Dear Pope". Rationally Speaking. 
  25. ^ Pigliucci, Massimo (1 August 2005). "Welcome, everyone!". 
  26. ^ Pigliucci, Massimo (20 March 2014). "So long, and thanks for all the fish". 
  27. ^ Stiefel, Todd; Metskas, Amanda K. (22 May 2013). "Julia Galef". The Humanist Hour. Episode 083. The Humanist. Retrieved 3 March 2015. 
  28. ^ Pigliucci, Massimo and Galef, Julia (27 February 2015). "RS128 - 5th Anniversary Live Show". Rationally Speaking (Podcast). New York City Skeptics. Retrieved 20 October 2015. 
  29. ^ Culp, Jennifer (2014). Neil DeGrasse Tyson. Great Science Writers Series. The Rosen Publishing Group. p. 74.  
  30. ^ Lombrozo, Tania (8 December 2014). "What If Atheists Were Defined By Their Actions?".  


Date Review article Work(s) reviewed
2013 "[Untitled review]". Books.   Woodruff, Paul (2011). The Ajax dilemma : justice, fairness, and rewards. New York: Oxford University Press. 

Book reviews

Additional articles can be found on his web sites (see "External Links" below).

  • "Is evolutionary psychology a pseudoscience?". Skeptical Inquirer 30 (2): 23–24. 2006. 
  • "Science and fundamentalism".  
  • "The power and perils of metaphors in science". Skeptical Inquirer 29 (5): 20–21. 2005. 
  • "What is philosophy of science good for?". Philosophy Now 44: 45. January–February 2004. 
  • Pigliucci M, Banta J, Bossu C, et al. (May–June 2004). "The alleged fallacies of evolutionary theory". Philosophy Now 46: 36–39. 

The following are a select few of Pigliucci's articles. Some may be found at the Internet Infidels' Secular Web.


  • Schlichting, Carl; Pigliucci, Massimo (1998). Phenotypic evolution : a reaction norm perspective. Sunderland, Mass.: Sinauer. 
  • Tales of the Rational (Freethought Press, 2000): A series of essays on atheism, straw-man arguments, creationism and the like.
  • Phenotypic Plasticity (Johns Hopkins University Press, 2001): A technical volume on research concerning nature and nurture questions.
  • Denying Evolution: Creationism, Scientism, and the Nature of Science. (Sinauer, 2002) ISBN 0-87893-659-9: This book covers the evolution-creation controversy, better science teaching, and why people have difficulties with critical thinking.
  • Phenotypic Integration (Oxford University Press, 2003) ISBN 0195160436: A collection of technical essays on the evolution of complex biological organs.
  • Making Sense of Evolution (with Jonathan Kaplan, University of Chicago Press, 2006, ISBN 978-0-226-66837-6): A philosophical examination of the fundamental concepts of evolutionary theory and practice.
  • Evolution: The Extended Synthesis (with Gerd B. Muller, MIT Press, 2010, ISBN 978-0262513678)
  • Nonsense on Stilts: How to Tell Science from Bunk (University of Chicago Press, 2010, ISBN 978-0-226-66786-7): This book presents a number of case studies on controversial topics in order to examine how science is conducted, how it is disseminated, how it is interpreted, and what it means to our society.
  • Answers for Aristotle: How Science and Philosophy Can Lead Us to a More Meaningful Life (Basic Books, 2012, ISBN 978-0-465-02138-3)
  • Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem (with Maarten Boudry, eds., University of Chicago Press, 2013, ISBN 978-0226051963)



In August 2000 Massimo started with a monthly internet column called Rationally Speaking. In August 2005 the column became a blog[25] where he wrote blogs till March 2014.[26] Since 1 February 2010 he co-hosts the bi-weekly Rationally Speaking podcast together with Julia Galef, whom he first met at the Northeast Conference on Science and Skepticism, held in September 2009.[27] The podcast is produced by the New York City Skeptics. He left the podcast in 2015 to pursue other interests.[28] In 2010 Neil DeGrasse Tyson explained on the show his justification for spending large amounts of government money on space programs. He eventually printed the transcript of his performance as a guest on the show in his book Space Chronicles as a full chapter covering eight pages.[29] Another episode in which Tyson explained his position on the label atheism, received attention on NPR.[30]

Rationally Speaking

Massimo Pigliucci criticised the newspaper article by Pope Francis entitled, "An open dialogue with non-believers". Pigliucci viewed the article as a monologue rather than a dialogue and, in a response personally addressed to Pope Francis, wrote that the Pope only offered non-believers "a reaffirmation of entirely unsubstantiated fantasies about God and his Son...followed by a confusion between the concept of love and truth, the whole peppered by a significant amount of historical revisionism and downright denial of the ugliest facets of your Church (and you will notice that I haven’t even brought up the pedophilia stuff!)."[24]

In 2001, he debated William Lane Craig over the existence of God.[23]

Pigliucci describes the mission of skeptics, referencing Carl Sagan's Demon Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark saying "What skeptics are about is to keep that candle lit and spread it as much as possible".[22] Pigliucci serves on the board of NYC Skeptics and on the advisory board of the Secular Coalition for America.[8]

While Pigliucci is an atheist himself,[19] he does not believe that science necessarily demands atheism because of two distinctions: the distinction between methodological naturalism and philosophical naturalism, and the distinction between value judgements and matters of fact. He believes that many scientists and science educators fail to appreciate these differences.[9] Pigliucci has criticized New Atheist writers for embracing what he considers to be scientism (although he largely excludes philosopher Daniel Dennett from this charge).[20] In a discussion of his book Answers for Aristotle: How Science and Philosophy Can Lead Us to a More Meaningful Life, Pigliucci told Skepticality podcast host Derek Colanduno, "Aristotle was the first ancient thinker to really take seriously the idea that you need both empirical facts, you need an evidence-based approach to the world and you need to be able to reflect on the meaning of those facts... If you want answers to moral questions then you don't ask the neurobiologist, you don't ask the evolutionary biologist, you ask the philosopher."[21]

Critical thinking and scepticism

Michael Shermer, Julia Galef and Massimo Pigliucci record live at NECSS 2013

Pigliucci writes regularly for Skeptical Inquirer on topics such as climate change denial, intelligent design, pseudoscience, and philosophy.[13] He has also written for Philosophy Now and maintains a blog called "Rationally Speaking'.[14] He has debated "deniers of evolution" (young-earth creationists and intelligent design proponents), including young earth creationists Duane Gish and Kent Hovind and intelligent design proponents William Dembski and Jonathan Wells, on many occasions.[15][16][17][18]

[10].relationship between science and religion, and the relationship between science and philosophy, the evolutionary theory to recognize the accomplishments and future promise of an outstanding young evolutionary biologist. As a philosopher, Pigliucci is interested in the structure and foundations of [1]Society for the Study of Evolution awarded annually by the [12] Prize,Theodosius Dobzhansky In 1997, while working at the University of Tennessee, Pigliucci received the [11]

This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.