World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Neuberg formula

Article Id: WHEBN0017494622
Reproduction Date:

Title: Neuberg formula  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Glossary of contract bridge terms, Bridge scoring
Collection:
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Publication
Date:
 

Neuberg formula

In duplicate bridge pairs tournaments, the Neuberg formula is a method of fairly adjusting match point scores when not all boards have been played the same number of times. The objective is to give equal weight to each board by calculating the expected number of match points that would have been earned if the board had been played the full number of times.[1]

A board might not have been played the full number of times because:

  • the movement was not completed, or
  • there was a phantom pair, or
  • a board had to be averaged because of an irregularity of some sort.

The method is:

  • Add 1 to the number of match points scored. (If the North American match point system is in use, where each comparison is worth one point rather than two, add a half-point instead.)
  • Multiply by the number of times the board should have been played (this should be the same number for all the boards in the tournament) and divide by the number of times it was actually played.
  • Then subtract 1 (or ½, whichever was added above).

Example

  • Board played 6 times.
  • Most other boards played 7 times.
  • Pair X scored 4 match points (out of 10).
  • Then (4+1) x (7/6) - 1 = 4.8333 (out of 12).
  • Pair Y scored 9 match points (out of 10).
  • Then (9+1) x (7/6) - 1 = 10.6667 (out of 12).
  • The scores are usually then rounded to the nearest 0.1, so 4.8 and 10.7 respectively.

The above method is in fairly common use. Note that the formula does not allow for the relative strengths of the partnerships. If, for instance because the movement was not completed, you miss out on playing against the weakest pair in the tournament, you do not benefit from any adjustment for this and you lose out. It would be relatively straightforward to adjust the formula to correct for this, but this is not done - perhaps because it is considered to be over-complicated.

A similar method can be used for example in a club competition when it is desired to give equal weight to scores achieved over a number of sessions, but there were different numbers of tables at each session.

External links

  • Neuberg at the English Bridge Union website

This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
 
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
 
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.
 


Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.