World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Operation Castle

Article Id: WHEBN0000523973
Reproduction Date:

Title: Operation Castle  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Castle Romeo, Castle Yankee, Castle Union, Operation Teapot, Bikini Atoll
Collection: 1954, Articles Containing Video Clips, Bikini Atoll Nuclear Explosive Tests
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia

Operation Castle

Operation Castle
Castle Romeo
Country United States
Test site Ebiriru (Ruby), Enewetak Atoll; Elugelab (Flora), Enewetak Atoll; Eninmen (Tare), Bikini Atoll; Namu (Charlie), Bikini Atoll; Yurochi aka Irioj (Dog), Bikini Atoll
Period 1954
Number of tests 6
Test type barge, dry surface
Max. yield 15 megatonnes of TNT (63 PJ)
Previous test series Operation Upshot–Knothole
Next test series Operation Teapot
Operation Castle test video

Operation Castle was a United States series of high-yield (high-energy) nuclear tests by Joint Task Force 7 (JTF-7) at Bikini Atoll beginning in March 1954. It followed Operation Upshot-Knothole and preceded Operation Teapot.

Conducted as a joint venture between the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) and the Department of Defense (DoD), the ultimate objective of the operation was to test designs for an aircraft-deliverable thermonuclear weapon.

Operation Castle was considered by government officials to be a success as it proved the feasibility of deployable "dry" fuel designs for thermonuclear weapons. There were technical difficulties with some of the tests: one device had a yield much lower than predicted (a "fizzle"), while two other devices detonated with over twice their predicted yields. One test in particular, Castle Bravo, resulted in extensive radiological contamination of nearby islands (including inhabitants and U.S. soldiers stationed there), as well as a nearby Japanese fishing boat (Daigo Fukuryū Maru), resulting in one direct fatality and continued health problems for many of those exposed. Public reaction to the tests and an awareness of the long-range effects of nuclear fallout has been attributed as being part of the motivation for the Partial Test Ban Treaty of 1963.


  • Background 1
  • Experiments 2
  • Test execution 3
  • Results 4
  • See also 5
  • References 6
  • External links 7


Bikini Atoll had previously hosted nuclear testing in 1946 as part of Operation Crossroads where the world’s fourth and fifth atomic weapons were detonated in Bikini Lagoon. Since then, US nuclear weapons testing had moved to Enewetok Atoll to take advantage of generally larger islands and deeper water. Both Atolls were part of the US Pacific Proving Grounds.

The extremely high yields of the Castle weapons caused concern within the AEC that potential damage to the limited infrastructure already established at Eniwetok would delay other operations. Additionally, the cratering from the Castle weapons was expected to be comparable to that of Ivy Mike, a 10.4 megatons of TNT (Mt) device tested at Eniwetok in 1952 leaving a crater approximately 1 mile (1.6 km) in diameter marking the location of the obliterated test island Elugelab.[1]

The Ivy Mike test was the world's first "hydrogen bomb", producing a full-scale thermonuclear or fusion explosion. The Ivy Mike device used liquid deuterium, an isotope of hydrogen, making it a "wet" bomb. The complex dewar mechanisms needed to store the liquid deuterium at cryogenic temperatures made the device three stories tall and 82 tons in total weight, far from being a deliverable weapon.[2] With the success of Ivy Mike as proof of the Teller-Ulam bomb concept, research began on using a “dry" fuel to make a practical fusion weapon so that the United States could begin production and deployment of thermonuclear weapons in quantity. The final result incorporated lithium deuteride as the fusion fuel in the Teller-Ulam design, vastly reducing size and weight and simplifying the overall design. Operation Castle was charted to test four dry fuel designs, two wet bombs, and one smaller device. Approval for Operation Castle was communicated to JTF-7 by Major General Kenneth D. Nichols, General Manager of the AEC, on 21 January 1954.


Operation Castle was organized into seven experiments, all but one of which were to take place at Bikini Atoll. Below is the original test schedule (as of February 1954).[3]

Operation Castle Schedule
Experiment Device Prototype Fuel Date Predicted yield Manufacturer Test location
Bravo Shrimp TX-21 40% Li-6 D (dry) 1 March 1954 6 Mt Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory Reef off Nam Is, Bikini
Union Alarm Clock EC-14 95% Li-6 D (dry) 11 March 1954 3-4 Mt Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory Barge off Iroij, Bikini
Yankee Jughead / Runt-II TX/EC-16 / TX/EC-24 Cryo H-2 (wet) / 40% Li-6 D (dry) 22 March 1954 8 Mt Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory Barge off Iroij, Bikini
Echo Ramrod N/A Cryo H-2 (wet) 29 March 1954 65–275 kt University of California Radiation Laboratory (Livermore) Eleleron, Enewetak
Nectar Zombie TX-15 Boosted fission 5 April 1954 1.8 Mt Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory Barge off Iroij, Bikini
Romeo Runt TX/EC-17A 7.5% Li-6 D (natural) 15 April 1954 4 Mt Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory Barge off Iroij, Bikini
Koon Morgenstern N/A 7.6% Li-6 D (natural) 22 April 1954 1 Mt University of California Radiation Laboratory (Livermore) Eneman, Bikini
AEC Authorization for Operation Castle

Operation Castle was intended to test lithium deuteride (LiD) as a thermonuclear fusion fuel. A solid at room temperature, LiD, if it worked, would be far more practical than the cryogenic liquid deuterium fuel in the Ivy Mike device. The same Teller-Ulam principle would be used as in the Ivy Mike "Sausage" device, but the fusion reactions were different. Ivy Mike fused deuterium with deuterium, but the LiD devices would fuse deuterium with tritium. The tritium was produced during the explosion by irradiating the lithium with fast neutrons.

Bravo and Union used lithium enriched in the Li-6 isotope while Romeo and Koon were fueled with natural lithium (92% Li-7, 7.5% Li-6). The use of natural lithium would be important to the ability of the US to rapidly expand its nuclear stockpile during the Cold War arms race.

As a hedge, development of liquid deuterium weapons continued in parallel. Even though they were much less practical because of the logistical problems dealing with the transport, handling, and storage of a cryogenic device, the cold war arms race drove the demand for a viable fusion weapon. The "Ramrod" and "Jughead" devices were liquid fuel designs greatly reduced in size and weight from their Ivy Mike "Sausage" predecessor. The "Jughead" device was ultimately weaponized and saw limited fielding in the inventory until the dry fuel weapons were common.

Nectar was not a fusion weapon in the same sense as the rest of the Castle series. Even though it used a dry lithium fuel for fission boosting, the principal reaction material in the second stage was uranium and plutonium. Similar to the Teller-Ulam configuration, a fission device was used to create high temperatures and pressures in order to compress a second fissionable mass that would have otherwise been too large to sustain an efficient reaction if it were triggered with conventional explosives. This experiment was intended to develop intermediate yield weapons for expanding the inventory (around 1-2 Mt vs. 4-8).

Many fusion or thermonuclear weapons generate much, or even most, of their yields from fission. Although the U-238 isotope of uranium will not sustain a chain reaction, it still fissions when irradiated by the intense fast neutron flux of a fusion explosion. Because U-238 is plentiful and has no critical mass, it can be added in almost unlimited quantities as a tamper around a fusion bomb, helping to contain the fusion reaction and contributing its own fission energy. Fission of the U-238 tamper contributed 77% (8 megatons) to the yield of the 10.4 Mt Ivy Mike explosion.

Test execution

The most notable event of Operation Castle was the Castle Bravo test. The dry fuel for Bravo was 40% Li-6 and 60% Li-7. Only the Li-6 was expected to breed tritium for the deuterium-tritium fusion reaction; the Li-7 was expected to be inert. Yet J. Carson Mark, head of the Los Alamos Theoretical Design Division, had speculated that Bravo could "go big", estimating that the device could produce an explosive yield as much as 20% more than had been originally calculated.[4] The Li-7 component turned out to be an excellent source of tritium through a previously unquantified reaction. In practice, Bravo exceeded expectations by 150%, yielding 15 Mt—1,000 times more powerful than the Little Boy weapon used on Hiroshima. Castle Bravo remains to this day the largest atmospheric detonation ever conducted by the United States, and the fifth largest detonation in the world.

Because Castle Bravo greatly exceeded its expected yield, JTF-7 was caught unprepared. Much of the permanent infrastructure on Bikini Atoll was heavily damaged. The intense thermal flash ignited a fire at a distance of 20 nautical miles (37 km) on the island of Eneu (base island of Bikini Atoll).[5] The ensuing fallout contaminated all of the atoll, so much so, that it could not be approached by JTF-7 for 24 hours after the test, and even then exposure times were limited.[6] As the fallout spread downwind to the east, more atolls were contaminated by radioactive calcium ash from the incinerated underwater coral banks. Although the atolls were evacuated soon after the test, 239 Marshallese on the Utirik, Rongelap, and Ailinginae Atolls were subjected to significant levels of radiation. 28 Americans stationed on the Rongerik Atoll were also exposed. Follow-up studies of the contaminated individuals began soon after the blast as Project 4.1, and though the short-term effects of the radiation exposure for most of the Marshallese were mild and/or hard to correlate, the long-term effects were pronounced. Additionally, 23 Japanese fishermen aboard Daigo Fukuryū Maru were also exposed to high levels of radiation. They suffered symptoms of radiation poisoning, and one crew member died in September 1954.

The heavy contamination and extensive damage from Bravo significantly delayed the rest of the series. The post-Bravo schedule was revised on 14 April 1954.[7]

Operation Castle Schedule (Post Bravo)
Experiment Original date Revised date Original yield Revised yield
Union 11 March 1954 22 April 1954 3-4 Mt 5-10 Mt
Yankee 22 March 1954 27 April 1954 8 Mt 9.5 Mt
Nectar 5 April 1954 20 April 1.8 Mt 1-3 Mt
Romeo 15 April 1954 27 March 1954 4 Mt 8 Mt
Koon 22 April 1954 7 April 1954 1 Mt 1.5 Mt

The Castle Romeo and Koon tests were complete by the time of this revision. The Echo test was canceled due to the liquid fuel design becoming obsolete with the success of dry-fueled Bravo. Yankee was similarly considered obsolete and so was conducted using a "Runt II" device (similar to the Union device) hastily completed at Los Alamos and flown to Bikini. With this revision, both of the wet fuel devices were removed from the test schedule.

As Operation Castle continued, the increased yields and fallout caused test locations to be re-evaluated. While the majority of the tests were planned for barges near the sand spit of Iroij, some were moved to the Bravo and Union craters. Additionally, Castle Nectar was moved from Bikini Atoll to the Ivy Mike crater at Eniwetok for expediency since Bikini was still heavily contaminated from the previous tests.[8]

The final test in Operation Castle took place on 14 May 1954.

United States' Castle series tests and detonations
Name [note 1] Date time (UT) Local time zone [note 2][9] Location [note 3] Elevation + height [note 4] Delivery,[note 5]
Purpose [note 6]
Device [note 7] Yield [note 8] Fallout [note 9] References Notes
Bravo 28 February 1954 18:45:00.0 MHT (11 hrs)
Namu (Charlie), Bikini Atoll 2 m (6 ft 7 in) + 2 m (6 ft 7 in) dry surface,
weapons development
TX-21 "Shrimp" 15 Mt [10][11][12][13] Used a RACER IV primary. Over twice as powerful as predicted, error in assessing Li-7. Lethal fallout, killed radioman on Japanese vessel Daigo Fukuryu Maru (Fifth Lucky Dragon); 1 fatality, 93+ injured. Design used in Mk-21/36.
Romeo 26 March 1954 18:30:00.4 MHT (11 hrs)
Yurochi aka Irioj (Dog), Bikini Atoll 0 + 4.3 m (14 ft) barge,
weapons development
TX/EC-17A "Runt" 11 Mt [10][11][12][13] Exceeded yield expectations, by almost a factor of 3. Proof test of the Mk-17, deployed as the EC-17.
29 March 1954 MHT (11 hrs)
Ebiriru (Ruby), Enewetak Atoll 3 m (9.8 ft) + barge,
weapons development
Cryo design "ramrod" unknown yield [10] Scheduled for Castle but not executed, location and time are as planned; cancelled when Bravo was so unexpectedly successful, made cryogenic thermonuke concepts obsolete.
Koon 6 April 1954 18:20:00.4 MHT (11 hrs)
Eninmen (Tare), Bikini Atoll 2 m (6 ft 7 in) + 1 m (3 ft 3 in) dry surface,
weapons development
"Morgenstern" 110 kt [10][11][12][13] UCRL design, last one that Teller worked on, secondary delayed too long, and fizzled at 110 kt yield.
Union 25 April 1954 18:10:00.6 MHT (11 hrs)
Yurochi aka Irioj (Dog), Bikini Atoll 0 + 4 m (13 ft) barge,
weapons development
TX-14 w/ RACER IV "Alarm Clock" 6.9 Mt [10][11][12][13] Prototype EC-14, used expensive 95% enriched Li-6 fuel, RACER IV primary.
Yankee 2 4 May 1954 18:10:00.1 MHT (11 hrs)
Yurochi aka Irioj (Dog), Bikini Atoll 0 + 4.3 m (14 ft) barge,
weapons development
TX/EC-24 RACER IV "Runt II" 13.5 Mt [10][11][12][13] Proof test of TX/EC-24 with a RACER IV primary. After Bravo's success, the wet/dry TX/EC-16 Jughead device that was to be tested was discarded for the Runt2 dry device, hence the "2" designation.
Nectar 13 May 1954 18:20:00.1 MHT (11 hrs)
Elugelab (Flora), Enewetak Atoll 0 + 4.3 m (14 ft) barge,
weapons development
TX-15 COBRA "Zombie" 1.7 Mt [10][11][12][13] Test of stage 3 fission from fast neutrons.
  1. ^ The US, France and Great Britain have code-named their test events, while the USSR and China did not, and therefore have only test numbers (with some exceptions – Soviet peaceful explosions were named). Word translations into English in parentheses unless the name is a proper noun. A dash followed by a number indicates a member of a salvo event. The US also sometimes named the individual explosions in such a salvo test, which results in "name1 – 1(with name2)". If test is canceled or aborted, then the row data like date and location discloses the intended plans, where known.
  2. ^ To convert the UT time into standard local, add the number of hours in parentheses to the UT time; for local daylight saving time, add one additional hour. If the result is earlier than 00:00, add 24 hours and subtract 1 from the day; if it is 24:00 or later, subtract 24 hours and add 1 to the day. All historical timezone data (excepting Johnston Atoll) are derived from here:
  3. ^ Rough place name and a latitude/longitude reference; for rocket-carried tests, the launch location is specified before the detonation location, if known. Some locations are extremely accurate; others (like airdrops and space blasts) may be quite inaccurate. "~" indicates a likely pro-forma rough location, shared with other tests in that same area.
  4. ^ Elevation is the ground level at the point directly below the explosion relative to sea level; height is the additional distance added or subtracted by tower, balloon, shaft, tunnel, air drop or other contrivance. For rocket bursts the ground level is "N/A". In some cases it is not clear if the height is absolute or relative to ground, for example, Plumbbob/John. No number or units indicates the value is unknown, while "0" means zero. Sorting on this column is by elevation and height added together.
  5. ^ Atmospheric, airdrop, balloon, gun, cruise missile, rocket, surface, tower, and barge are all disallowed by the Partial Nuclear Test Ban Treaty. Sealed shaft and tunnel are underground, and remained useful under the PTBT. Intentional cratering tests are borderline; they occurred under the treaty, were sometimes protested, and generally overlooked if the test was declared to be a peaceful use.
  6. ^ Include weapons development, weapon effects, safety test, transport safety test, war, science, joint verification and industrial/peaceful, which may be further broken down.
  7. ^ Designations for test items where known, "?" indicates some uncertainty about the preceding value, nicknames for particular devices in quotes. This category of information is often not officially disclosed.
  8. ^ Estimated energy yield in tons, kilotons, and megatons. A ton of TNT equivalent is defined as 4.184 gigajoules (1 gigacalorie).
  9. ^ Radioactive emission to the atmosphere aside from prompt neutrons, where known. The measured species is only iodine-131 if mentioned, otherwise it is all species. No entry means unknown, probably none if underground and "all" if not; otherwise notation for whether measured on the site only or off the site, where known, and the measured amount of radioactivity released.


Bikini Atoll in the summer 1954 after the completion of Operation Castle.

Operation Castle was an unqualified success for the implementation of dry fuel devices. The Bravo design was quickly weaponized and is suspected to be the progenitor of the Mk-21 gravity bomb. The Mk-21 design project began on 26 March 1954 (just three weeks after Bravo) with production of 275 weapons beginning in late 1955. Romeo, relying on natural lithium, was rapidly turned into the Mk-17 bomb, the first deployable US H-bomb,[14] and was available to strategic forces as an Emergency Capability weapon by mid-1954. Most of the Castle dry fuel devices eventually appeared in the inventory and ultimately grandfathered the majority of thermonuclear configurations.

In contrast, the Livermore-designed Koon was a failure. Using natural lithium and a heavily modified Teller-Ulam configuration, the test produced only 110 kiloton of an expected 1.5 megaton yield. While engineers at the Radiation Laboratory had hoped it would lead to a promising new field of weapons, it was eventually determined that the design allowed premature heating of the lithium fuel, thereby disrupting the delicate fusion conditions.

See also


  1. ^ Operation Ivy, pg 192
  2. ^ Dark Sun, pg 495.
  3. ^ Castle Series, pg 247
  4. ^ O'Keefe, page 179
  5. ^ Castle Series, pg 209
  6. ^ Hacker, pg 140
  7. ^ Castle Series pg 268
  8. ^ Castle Series pg 248.
  9. ^ "Timezone Historical Database". Retrieved 2014-03-08. 
  10. ^ a b c d e f g Sublette, Carey, Nuclear Weapons Archive, retrieved 2014-01-06 
  11. ^ a b c d e f Hansen, Chuck (1995), The Swords of Armageddon, Vol. 8, Sunnyvale, CA: Chukelea Publications,  
  12. ^ a b c d e f United States Nuclear Tests: July 1945 through September 1992 (PDF) (DOE/NV-209 REV15), Las Vegas, NV: Department of Energy, Nevada Operations Office, 2000-12-01, retrieved 2013-12-18 
  13. ^ a b c d e f Yang, Xiaoping; North, Robert; Romney, Carl (August 2000), CMR Nuclear Explosion Database (Revision 3), SMDC Monitoring Research 
  14. ^ Development of the Mk 17 bomb, Atomic
  • The United States Department of Defense; Defense Nuclear Agency (1982). Castle Series. Washington DC: United States Government Printing Office. 
  • The United States Department of Defense; Defense Nuclear Agency (1983). Operation Ivy--1952. Washington DC: United States Government Printing Office. 
  • O'Keefe, Bernard J. (1983). Nuclear Hostages. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company. 
  • Hacker, Barton C (1994). Elements of Controversy: The Atomic Energy Commission and Radiation Safety in Nuclear Weapons Testing. Los Angeles: University of California Press. 

External links

  • The short film Operation Castle Commanders Report (1954) is available for free download at the Internet Archive
  • The short film Military Effects Studies Operation Castle (1954) is available for free download at the Internet Archive
  • The short film Nuclear Test Film - Operation Castle (1954) is available for free download at the Internet Archive
  • Operation Castle
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.