World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Recognition of same-sex unions in Guam

Article Id: WHEBN0022462705
Reproduction Date:

Title: Recognition of same-sex unions in Guam  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Same-sex marriage in Idaho, Same-sex marriage in Illinois, Same-sex marriage in Kansas, Same-sex marriage in Missouri, Same-sex marriage in New Mexico
Collection:
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Publication
Date:
 

Recognition of same-sex unions in Guam

Legal status of
same-sex relationships
Marriage
Recognized
Previously performed and not invalidated
  1. Can be registered also in Aruba, Curaçao and Sint Maarten
  2. Licensed in some counties in Kansas but same-sex marriage is not recognized by the state
  3. Currently legal in St. Louis, Missouri
  4. When performed in Mexican states that have legalized same-sex marriage

*Not yet in effect

LGBT portal

Guam, an

Marriage statutes

Guam's statutes do not specify the sex of the parties, but their prohibition on marriage "between uncles and nieces or aunts and nephews" show they anticipate only different-sex marriages. The parties "must declare in the presence of the person solemnizing the marriage that they take each other as husband and wife." With respect to marriages from other jurisdictions, the statues say:[1]

All marriages contracted outside of the territory of Guam, which would be valid by the laws of the country in which the same were contracted, are valid in the territory of Guam.

Federal courts in Guam are subject to the precedents set in 2014 by the decisions of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in Latta v. Otter and Sevcik v. Sandoval, which found Nevada's and Utah's denial of marriage rights to same-sex couples unconstitutional.

Proposed legislation

After Vermont enacted same-sex marriage legislation, the 27th Guam Youth Congress, an advisory body which submits legislation to committees of the Legislature of Guam, forwarded a bill to legalize civil unions to the legislature, with the bill being supported by Speaker Derick Baza Hills.

A similar measure failed in the 25th Guam Youth Congress by just one vote. Citing recent rulings in the courts such as the unanimous decision overturning the ban on same-sex marriage in Iowa, Hills later commented that the courts would be essential to make sure we "allow for equal rights"[2] he stated in a press release. While same-sex marriage is currently not being considered in Guam, Hills made sure to point out that "We do have advocates in the Legislature [who support same-sex civil unions] ... I do feel and know that there are senators comfortable supporting this legislation," Hills said. Hills called on the Legislature of Guam to introduce legislation to create such unions, though the extent of rights to be granted is unknown.[2]

On June 3, 2009, Vice-Speaker BJ Cruz introduced Bill No. 138, which would establish same-sex civil unions containing all the rights and benefits of civil marriage in Guam.[3] The bill was heavily condemned by the Catholic Church.[4] The bill did not get sufficient votes to make it to the session floor.[5]

Due to opposition to the bill within the religious community, Bill 212 was introduced by proponents of same-sex unions should the civil union bill fail to pass. The bill mirrors the bill passed in Hawaii that provided significantly limited rights. The bill is known as a "Designated Beneficiary Agreement," and unlike the civil union bill, would be open for both same-sex and opposite-sex couples.[6]

Public Opinion

In a 2009 poll conducted by Pacific Daily News, 26% of Guamanians supported same-sex marriage, 27% supported same-sex domestic partnerships or civil unions, and 29% of responders said that there should be no legal recognition of same-sex relationships in Guam.[7]

See also

References

  1. ^ "Chapter 3. The Contract of Marriage". Guam Code Annotated. Compiler of Laws, Supreme Court of Guam. Retrieved November 2, 2014. 
  2. ^ a b Lee, Yvonne S. (10 April 2009). "Youth congress pass bill to legalize same sex civil unions". Pacific Daily News. Retrieved 2009-04-23. 
  3. ^ Same-sex civil unions proposed
  4. ^ "Archbishop Apuron Responds To Senator Cruz's Same Sex Civil Union Bill". 
  5. ^ Aguon, Mindy (February 24, 2011). "Gay community hopeful for Guam civil unions". Kuam News. Retrieved 27 August 2013. 
  6. ^ http://www.kuam.com/bm/news/new-proposed-legislation-for-civil-unions-criticiz.shtml?15515
  7. ^ www.guampdn.com/survey-26-percent-support-same-sex-marriage

External links

  • Full text of the same-sex civil unions bill no. 138
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
 
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
 
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.
 


Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.