World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Religious Procession in Kursk Province

Article Id: WHEBN0026287187
Reproduction Date:

Title: Religious Procession in Kursk Province  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Ilya Repin, 1883 in art, Kursk, Tretyakov Gallery, Procession, Theotokos of Kursk, Realism (arts)
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia

Religious Procession in Kursk Province

Religious Procession in Kursk Province, Tretyakov Gallery, Moscow. 175 × 280 cm

Religious Procession in Kursk Province (also known as Easter Procession in the District of Kursk or A Religious Procession in Kursk Gubernia'[1]) (Russian: Крестный ход в Курской губернии) is a large oil on canvas painting by the Russian realist painter and sculptor Ilya Repin (1844–1930). Completed between 1880 and 1883, the work shows a seething, huddled mass attending the annual religious procession (crucession) carrying the famous icon Our Lady of Kursk from its home at the Korennaya Monastery to the nearby city of Kursk in western Russia.

The procession is led through a dusty landscape by robed, Orthodox priests holding icons, festoons and banners over their heads.[2] Behind them follow a crowd mostly of peasants, but ranging from beggars and cripples, police and military officers to figures from the provincial elite. Religious Procession lead to controversy when first exhibited due to the icon being held by a man who appears to be drunk.[3]

The work is a continuation of Repin's social commentary in his work, and highlights perceived abuses by both church and state. He wrote of the work, " am applying all of my insignificant forces to try to give true incarnation to my ideas; life around me disturbs me a great deal and gives me no peace – it begs to be captured on canvas..."[4]


The Our Lady of Kursk icon, 13th century
At the right, burly peasants carry a platform holding the icon inside an elaborate neo-classical case; only gleams of light reflecting off the gold riza icon-cover can be made out. Lines of peasants joining hands hold back the crowd, the foremost at the left trying to stop the crippled boy breaking through the cordon with his stick. Alongside ride peasant or priest stewards and officials and police in uniform, some of the latter beating back the crowd with their riding crops. Behind the icon follow priests and better-dressed people, carrying icons in front of their chest, and an "effete, dandified and bored priest" in vestments carefully straightens his hair.[5] There is a comic effect with a stout middle-aged woman in a yellow dress and bonnet carrying an icon behind him, who looks very like a priest in his vestments. An empty icon-case, presumably that of the icon carried by the wealthy woman behind, is carried with as much reverence as the icon itself.[5] The hillside at right appears to have been recently cleared of timber, with fresh tree stumps. Further back another platform, holding what appears to be a circular icon, is preceded by two large banners, and behind that a large processional cross can be made out through the cloud of dust.
The Korennaya Monastery

The Procession is representative of Repin's style from the period, in that it first appears to be a scene from everyday life in Russia. In fact, it pointedly shows people from a range of social strata united and moving collectively towards their destination at Korennaya.[6]

Provenance and critical opinion

Village Procession at Easter, by Vasily Perov, 1861. Tretyakov Gallery, Moscow. Although Perov's work is less monumental and tends more towards narrative, he depicts ordinary life in a similarly realistic way to Repin, and also tends towards a judgement of the social background underpinning its subject matter.

The painting was highly popular, but controversial. The journal publishing a favourable review by the leading critic Vladimir Stasov published an editorial in the next issue dissociating itself from his views, and a second review by the editor. Stasov had made much of the violence of the riders to the crowd. Apart from Leo Tolstoy, who praised the painting and regarded it as neutral in its depiction of the social system, all were agreed that it was hostile to the established social order. Another reviewer noted with disapproval the "undesirables who thronged around it at exhibition, noting a preponderance of liberated women with short haircuts, nihilistic young men, and a strong Jewish element; the chief characters of Imperial xenophobia".[5]

The writer Richard Brettell summarised the painting as "a sort of summa of Russian society, diverse members of which move uneasily but restlessly together down a dusty path through a naked landscape towards a future that cannot be seen even by the painter."[6] Critic Christian Brinton saw a mixture of "fat, gold-robed priests, stupid peasants, wretched cripples, cruel mouthed officials, and inflated rural dignitaries".[2] Repin is less sympathetic to the privileged members of the procession, whom he depicts as uncaring and indifferent to their struggling fellow travelers. The disenfranchised members of Russian society are represented by, amongst others, the old and young peasants in the left foreground (serfdom in Russia had been abolished in 1861).

The painting was bought by the leading collector Pavel Tretyakov for a record 10,000 roubles, but Tretyakov wanted Repin to replace the maids carrying the empty icon-case with "a beautiful young girl, exuding spiritual rapture". Repin refused.[5] Tretyakov's large collection was opened as a museum in his lifetime, and is now the much augmented, state-run Tretyakov Gallery in Moscow.


  1. ^ The English title used by the Tretyakov, p. 143
  2. ^ a b Brinton, Christian. "Modern Artists", 2007. 146. ISBN 1-4067-3795-X
  3. ^ Geisler, Michael E. "National symbols, fractured identities: contesting the national narrative". Middlebury, 2005. 104. ISBN 1-58465-437-6
  4. ^ "Krestny Khod (Religious Procession) in Kursk Gubernia". Tretyakov Gallery. Retrieved on 13 March 2010.
  5. ^ a b c d Jackson, 44
  6. ^ a b Brettell, Richard. "Modern art, 1851–1929: capitalism and representation". Oxford Paperbacks, 1999. 160. ISBN 0-19-284220-X


  • Alpatov, Mikhail. Russian Impact on Art. New York: Philosophical Library, 1950.
  • Bolton, Roy. Russia & Europe in the Nineteenth Century. Sphinx Books, 1999. ISBN 1-907200-02-9
  • Jackson, David L., The wanderers and critical realism in nineteenth-century Russian painting, Manchester University Press, 2006, ISBN 0-7190-6434-1, ISBN 978-0-7190-6434-0, google books
  • State Tretyakov Gallery; Guidebook, 2000, Moscow, Avant-Garde, ISBN 5-86394-106-5
  • Sternin, Grigory. Ilya Efimovitch Repin: Painter of Russian History. USSR, 1995. ISBN 0-569-08846-1
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.