World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil


Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil

RT2 (Roundtable No 2) in Zurich in 2005.
Roundtable No 2 (RT2) in Zurich in 2005.

The Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) was established in 2004 with the objective of promoting the growth and use of sustainable [1]

RSPO is an association under Swiss Law composed of various organizations from different sectors of the palm oil industry (oil palm producers, palm oil processors or traders, consumer goods manufacturers, retailers, banks and investors, environmental or nature conservation NGOs and social or developmental NGOs) for the purpose of developing and implementing global standards for sustainable palm oil.[2][3]

RSPO is inspired by the idea of the "

  • Official website
  • Palm Oil - Production, Consumption, Exports, and Imports Statistics by Country
  • Are emission reductions from peatlands MRV-able?
  • The impacts and opportunities of oil palm in Southeast Asia: What do we know and what do we need to know? (2009).
  • FAQ: Palm oil, forests and climate change.
  • What is the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil? |

External links

  1. ^ "Milestones - Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil". Retrieved 2013-08-07. 
  2. ^ "History - Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil". Retrieved 2013-08-07. 
  3. ^ "Category - RSPO Members - Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil". Retrieved 2013-08-07. 
  4. ^ "Types of Membership - Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil". Retrieved 2013-08-07. 
  5. ^ "How to Apply - Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil". Retrieved 2013-08-07. 
  6. ^ "CHAPTER III – General Assembly meetings - Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil". Retrieved 2013-08-07. 
  7. ^ Murniati (2002). "From imperata cylindrica grasslands to productive agroforestry". Tropenbos International. Retrieved 2013-08-04. 
  8. ^ "Environment - Bumitama Agri Ltd.". Bumitama Agri. Retrieved 2013-08-04. 
  9. ^ Eric Gottwald (14 November 2013). "Workers Give Message to RSPO: Don’t Certify Abuse!". Labor is Not a Commodity. Retrieved 15 November 2013. 
  10. ^ "Empty Promises: RSPO Labor Case Studies". Bogor: Sawit Watch; Washington, DC:  
  11. ^ "‘Certified’ palm oil not a solution". 2009-11-03. Retrieved 2013-08-04. 
  12. ^ "Unilever & palm oil | News | Unilever Global". 11 December 2009. Archived from the original on 2010-01-02. Retrieved 2011-07-25. 
  13. ^ "Palm oil | Greenpeace UK". Retrieved 2013-08-04. 
  14. ^ "How Unilever Palm Oil Suppliers are burning up Borneo". Greenpeace. 21 April 2008. Archived from the original on 2010-03-10. 
  15. ^ "Unilever takes stance against deforestation". Unilever. 11 December 2009. Archived from the original on 2010-01-02. 
  16. ^ "Sustainable Palm Oil". Unilever. Archived from the original on 2010-01-02. 
  17. ^ Bob Norman (GreenPalm) (2010-04-21). "Spreading the word about GreenPalm". Retrieved 2013-08-04. 
  18. ^ Thatcher, Sandra. "Unilever drops palm oil supplier - ICIS Green Chemicals". Retrieved 2013-08-04. 
  19. ^ "PT SMART Tbk | Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil". RSPO. 2005-01-31. Retrieved 2013-08-04. 
  20. ^ David Gilbert. "RSPO Dispatch: Oil palm is not development » Rainforest Action Network Blog". Retrieved 2013-08-04. 
  21. ^ "WWF - Scoring palm oil buyers in Europe". Archived from the original on 2009-12-31. Retrieved 2011-07-25. 
  22. ^ "What is WWF doing about conversion of forests for palm oil?". World Wildlife Fund. Archived from the original on 2010-03-03. 
  23. ^ "Palm Oil | Industries | WWF". World Wildlife Fund. Retrieved 2013-08-04. 
  24. ^ "RSB Roundtable on Sustainable Biomaterials | Roundtable on Sustainable Biomaterials". Retrieved 2013-08-05. 
  25. ^ Daniel Swensen. "Roundtable on Sustainable Forests". Retrieved 2013-08-05. 
  26. ^ "RTSD". Retrieved 2013-08-05. 
  27. ^ "Round Table on Responsible Soy Association". 2011-06-21. Retrieved 2013-08-05. 
  28. ^ "Roundtable for a Sustainable Cocoa Economy: TOWARDS A SUSTAINABLE WORLD COCOA ECONOMY". 2009-02-12. Retrieved 2013-08-05. 


See also

Similar initiatives have been established for other sectors including: Roundtable on Sustainable Biofuels, Roundtable on Sustainable Biomaterials,[24] Roundtable on Sustainable Forests,[25] Roundtable on Sustainable Development,[26] Roundtable on Responsible Soy,[27] and Roundtable for a Sustainable Cocoa Economy.[28]

Other Roundtable initiatives

WWF continues to monitor the palm oil industry.[23]

Clearing for oil palm plantations threatens some of the world’s greatest forests, endangered species such as orangutans, and puts forest-dwelling people at risk. But with better management practices, the palm oil industry could provide benefits without threatening our some of our most breathtaking natural treasures...

Reaching those objectives requires a common language for industry, environmental and social groups to work together. Through the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO), WWF has helped to establish a platform for these parties to collaborate towards the production of sustainable palm oil.Thanks to the RSPO, sustainable palm oil is now on the market. By applying stringent production criteria to all stages of palm oil manufacture, some companies are proving that oil palm plantations need not flourish at the expense of rainforests. But so much more remains to be done. Too many palm oil producers still ignore the destructive impacts of palm oil plantations, contributing to biodiversity loss and social unrest and more companies that buy palm oil need to switch to using certified sustainable palm oil in their products.

The WWF released in 2009 a Palm Oil Buyer's Scorecard.[21] The website stated in 2010:[22]

World Wildlife Fund (WWF)

The RSPO is the world’s largest annual meeting of oil palm industry, environmentalists, human rights advocates, and, most importantly, community members. Today, I watched as a community member from Borneo stood up in front of oil palm producers, NGOs, and technocrats, identified himself as a victim of oil palm expansion, and tore apart the falsity that some of the world’s richest businessmen desperately want us to believe; the falsity that oil palm helps the world’s poor:

"They say oil palm is development. They say Malaysia has cars and big cities because of oil palm. But it is not oil palm, it is from other things, like our oil and our logging. Giant companies, most of them Malaysian, ignore customary land rights and take our land out from under us...

Oil palm does not lead to the development of a country. Wealth, contained in the natural resources of the our forests and controlled by us, is flattened and burned, and then collected by the world’s rich, from Companies like Sinar Mas, Cargill, IOI, and Duta Palma. Oil palm does not bring wealth to the poor, it takes it away. Oil palm development, like so many neo-colonial trading systems, makes the poor poorer and the rich richer."

The RAN also has a position of qualified support for the RSPO system. Blog posts by David Gilbert,[20] a Research Fellow at RAN, who attended the 2009 RSPO annual meeting in Kuala Lumpur, showed some of the intense dissatisfaction with the process:

Rainforest Action Network

PT SMART, the palm oil supplier that was working with Unilever, apparently thinks that the Unilever contract is too small to be of any serious consequence. The cancelled contract apparently affected only 3% [18] of their total production. PT SMART is a member of the RSPO.[19]

Unilever is currently purchasing GreenPalm certificates and aims to buy all of their physical palm oil from certified sustainable sources by 2015.[17] Although Unilever uses more than a million tonnes of palm oil per year, this represents less than 5% of the total production of palm oil.

The results of an investigation published in 2008 by Greenpeace [14] found worrying issues with one of Unilever's main palm oil suppliers, which Unilever accepted and announced they would stop using that supplier.[15] Unilever and Greenpeace also announced that they would work together to lobby for a moratorium on deforestation for palm oil.[16]

Industry efforts to bring this deforestation under control have come through the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO). It was set up in 2004 to establish clear ethical and ecological standards for producing palm oil, and its members include high-street names like Unilever, Cadbury's, Nestlé and Tesco, as well as palm oil traders such as Cargill and ADM. Together, these companies represent 40 per cent of global palm oil trade. But since then forest destruction has continued. Many RSPO members are taking no steps to avoid the worst practices associated with the industry, such as large-scale forest clearance and taking land from local people without their consent. On top of this, the RSPO actually risks creating the illusion of sustainable palm oil, justifying the expansion of the palm oil industry.

But Greenpeace UK's website states:[13]

Unilever's decision could represent a defining moment for the palm oil industry. What we're seeing here is the world's largest buyer of palm oil using its financial muscle to sanction suppliers who are destroying rainforests and clearing peat lands. This has set a new standard for others to follow.

Greenpeace are occupying a difficult ground of being both a supporter and a critic of the RSPO. According to a press release on the Unilever website from December 2009[12] Executive Director of Greenpeace John Sauven said:


Essentially, RSPO companies are subjected to technical principles and criteria, but social and environmental issues of oil palm cultivation are largely framed within flawed political processes, poor governance and unsustainable market demand. Understood within this context, the RSPO is a voluntary certification process for a market premium and membership that may be able to add a much sought after and totally misleading 'green tag' to the industry. Moreover, it provides certification without having to actually address some of the most very basic, structural issues that gave rise to the adverse impacts of oil palm cultivation. Friends of the Earth International therefore does not regard the RSPO as a credible certification process as it is only a limited tool of technicality which is not able to adequately address the horrendous impacts of oil palm cultivation on forests, land and communities.

FOEI are extremely critical of the RSPO. According to their press release issued 3 February, 2009:[11]

Friends of the Earth International

Non-governmental organisations interested in the issue of palm oil production and the destruction of rainforest are divided about the RSPO.

NGOs and the RSPO

The formation of the RSPO has not been without criticism from various sectors, especially the environmental NGOs. The main issues flagged include: the impact of palm oil plantation expansion on the orangutan population; destruction of tropical forest for the new oil palm plantation schemes in South-East Asia; and the burning and draining of large tracks of peat swamp forest in Kalimantan, Indonesia. The fact that RSPO members are allowed to clear cut pristine forest areas, when there would be large areas of Imperata grasslands (alang alang) available in e.g. Indonesia[7] raises doubts about the commitment on sustainability, see e.g. Bumitama Agri's CSR (Corporate social responsibility) on logging practices.[8] In 2013, the 11th annual RSPO meeting was crashed by palm oil workers and others,[9] and Indonesian and international labour-rights groups have documented a litany of abuses, including forced labour and child labour. A 2013 study uncovered "flagrant disregard for human rights at some of the very plantations the RSPO certifies as 'sustainable.'"[10]



  • Criticisms 1
  • NGOs and the RSPO 2
    • Friends of the Earth International 2.1
    • Greenpeace 2.2
    • Rainforest Action Network 2.3
    • World Wildlife Fund (WWF) 2.4
  • Other Roundtable initiatives 3
  • See also 4
  • References 5
  • External links 6

The organization holds an annual meeting to bring together the various stakeholders to negotiate and discuss various issues affecting the industry.[6]


This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.