World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Scunthorpe problem


Scunthorpe problem

The Scunthorpe problem is the blocking of e-mails, forum posts or search results by a spam filter or search engine because their text contains a string of letters that are shared with an obscene word. While computers can easily identify strings of text within a document, broad blocking rules may result in false positives, causing innocent phrases to be blocked.


  • Origin and history 1
  • Other examples 2
    • Refused web domain names and email addresses 2.1
    • Blocked web searches 2.2
    • Blocked emails 2.3
      • Blocked for word with two meanings 2.3.1
    • Modified content 2.4
    • Other instances 2.5
    • Blocked pages 2.6
  • See also 3
  • References 4
  • External links 5

Origin and history

The problem was named after an incident in 1996 in which AOL's profanity filter prevented residents of the town of Scunthorpe, Lincolnshire, England, from creating accounts with AOL, because the town's name contains the substring cunt.[1] Years later, Google's filters apparently made the same mistake, preventing residents from searching for local businesses that included Scunthorpe in their names.[2]

Other examples

Mistaken decisions by obscenity filters include:

Refused web domain names and email addresses

  • In April 1998, Jeff Gold attempted to register the domain name, but he was blocked by an InterNIC filter prohibiting the "seven dirty words" which was active between 1996 and the transfer of control to ICANN later the same year.[3] (Shitake is from the Japanese name for the edible fungus Lentinula edodes.)
  • In 2000, a Canadian television news story on web filtering software found that the website for the Montreal Urban Community (Communauté urbaine de Montréal, in French) was entirely blocked because its domain name was its French acronym CUM (;[4] "cum" (among other meanings) is English-language slang for semen.
  • In February 2004, in Scotland, Craig Cockburn reported that he was unable to use his surname (pronounced "Coburn") with Hotmail; Hotmail suggested spelling his name C0ckburn (with a zero instead of the letter "o"), but later reversed the ban.[5] In 2010 he had a similar problem registering on the BBC site where again the first four characters of his surname caused a problem for the content filter.[6] Separately he had problems with his workplace email because of the name of the pharmaceutical Cialis, which was often the subject line used on spam or scam emails, occurring within his job title of software specialist.
  • In February 2006, Linda Callahan, a resident of Ashfield, Massachusetts, was initially prevented from registering her name with Yahoo! as an e-mail address as it contained the substring allah. Yahoo! later reversed the ban.[7]
  • In July 2008, Dr. Herman I. Libshitz was initially unable to get the e-mail address he wanted from Verizon because it contained the substring shit. The company later apologized and lifted the ban.[8]

Blocked web searches

  • In the months leading up to January 1996, some web searches for Super Bowl XXX were being filtered, because the Roman numeral for the game and the site (XXX) is also used to identify pornography.[9]
  • The filter of the free wireless service of the town of Whakatane in New Zealand blocked searches involving the town's own name, because the phonetic analysis used by the filter deemed the "whak" to sound like fuck.[10] The town name is Maori, and in the Maori language "wh" is most commonly pronounced as "f".
  • Gareth Roelofse noted in 2004, "We found many library Net stations, school networks and Internet cafes block sites with the word 'sex' in the domain name. This was a challenge for because its target audience is school children."[2]
  • In July 2011, web searches in China on the name Jiang were blocked following claims on the Sina Weibo microblogging site that former president Jiang Zemin had died. Since the word "jiang" meaning "river" is written with the same Chinese character, searches related to rivers including the Yangtze (Cháng Jiāng) produced the message "According to the relevant laws, regulations and policies, the results of this search cannot be displayed."[11]

Blocked emails

  • In 2001, Yahoo! Mail erroneously changed words, including medireview in place of medieval. This was due to an email filter which automatically replaced Javascript-related strings with alternate versions, to prevent the possibility of cross-site scripting in HTML email. The filter would hyphenate the terms "Javascript", "Jscript", "Vbscript" and "Livescript", and replaced "eval", "mocha" and "expression" with the similar but not quite synonymous terms "review", "espresso" and "statement", respectively. Assumptions were involved in the writing of the filters: no attempts were made to limit these string replacements to script sections and attributes, or to respect word boundaries, in case this would leave some loopholes open.[12][13][14]
  • In October 2004, it was reported that the Horniman Museum in London was failing to receive some of its e-mail because filters mistakenly decided that its name was a version of the words horny man.[15]
  • Problems can occur with the words socialism, socialist, and specialist because they contain the substring Cialis, the brand name for an erectile dysfunction medication commonly advertised in spam e-mails. Blocking of the word specialist is liable to block emailed résumés and curricula vitae and other material including job descriptions.[16]
  • In February 2003, members of Parliament at the British House of Commons found that a new spam filter was blocking e-mails to them. It blocked e-mails containing references to the Sexual Offences Bill then under debate, and some messages relating to a Liberal Democrat consultation paper on censorship.[17] It also blocked e-mails sent in Welsh because it did not recognise the language.[18]
  • Residents of the English towns of Penistone,[19] Lightwater[19] and Clitheroe have all been repeatedly inconvenienced because their towns' names include substrings (penis, twat, clit) regarded as offensive by filtering software.[20]

Blocked for word with two meanings

  • In May 2006, Ray Kennedy from Manchester in the UK found that e-mails that he had written to his local council to complain about a planning application had been blocked as they contained the word erection when referring to a structure.[21]
  • In October 2004, e-mails advertising the pantomime Dick Whittington sent by a teacher from Norwich in the UK were blocked by school computers because of the use of the word Dick, sometimes used as slang for penis.[22]
  • Resumes of magna cum laude graduates have been blocked by spam filters because of inclusion of the word cum, which is Latin for with (in this usage) but is sometimes used as slang for semen in English usage.[23]
  • Blocked e-mails and web searches relating to The Beaver (based in Winnipeg) caused the publisher to change its name to Canada's History after 89 years of publication.[24] Publisher Deborah Morrison commented: "Back in 1920, The Beaver was a perfectly appropriate name. And while its other meaning is nothing new, its ambiguity began to pose a whole new challenge with the advance of the Internet. The name became an impediment to our growth".[19]
  • A councillor in Dudley found an email flagged for profanity by his council's security software after mentioning the Black Country dish faggots.[25]
  • In 2007, the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds blocked ornithological terms such as cock (male bird) and tit, shag and booby from its discussion forums.[26]

Modified content

Some websites have anti-obscenity filters which automatically replace offensive content with words intended to be equivalent in meaning.[27]

  • In June 2008, a news site run by the American Family Association filtered an Associated Press article on sprinter Tyson Gay, replacing instances of "gay" with "homosexual", thus rendering his name as "Tyson Homosexual".[28]
  • Several websites running rudimentary obscenity filters have replaced the word "ass" with "butt", resulting in "clbuttic" for "classic" and "buttbuttinate" for "assassinate".[27][29]

Other instances

Blocked pages

  • In January 2014, files used in the online game League of Legends were reported as being blocked by some UK ISP filters due to the names 'VarusExpirationTimer.luaobj' and 'XerathMageChainsExtended.luaobj' containing the letters used in the word "sex".[31]

See also


  1. ^ Clive Feather (25 April 1996). Peter G. Neumann, ed. "AOL censors British town's name!". ACM Committee on Computers and Public Policy. 
  2. ^ a b Declan McCullagh (23 April 2004). "Google's chastity belt too tight". 
  3. ^ Paul Festa (27 April 1998). """Food domain found "obscene.  
  4. ^ "Foire aux questions". CBC/Radio-Canada. Retrieved 24 February 2011. 
  5. ^ Barker, Garry (26 February 2004). "How Mr C0ckburn fought spam". The Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved 24 February 2011. 
  6. ^ Cockburn, Craig (9 March 2010). "BBC fail – my correct name is not permitted". Retrieved 24 February 2011. 
  7. ^ "Is Yahoo Banning Allah?". Kallahar's Place. Retrieved 24 February 2011. 
  8. ^ "When your name gets turned against you". Archived from the original on 5 August 2008. Retrieved 3 August 2008. 
  9. ^ "E-Rate And Filtering: A Review Of The Children's Internet Protection Act". Congressional Hearings. General. Energy and Commerce, Subcommittee on Telecommunications and the Internet. April 4, 2001.
  10. ^ "F-Word Town's Name Gets Censored By Internet Filter". Retrieved 27 July 2011. 
  11. ^ Chin, Josh (6 July 2011). "Following Jiang Death Rumors, China’s Rivers Go Missing". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 7 July 2011. 
  12. ^ "Yahoo admits mangling e-mail". BBC News. 19 July 2002. Retrieved 2013-06-21. 
  13. ^ "Hard news". Need To Know 2002-07-12. 12 July 2002. Retrieved 2013-06-21. 
  14. ^ Knight, Will (15 July 2002). "Email security filter spawns new words". New Scientist. Retrieved 2013-06-21. 
  15. ^ Kwintner, Adrian (5 October 2004). "Name of museum is confused with porn". News Shopper. Archived from the original on 28 March 2012. Retrieved 24 February 2011. 
  16. ^ "Comment headaches". The Peking Duck. 21 November 2004. Retrieved 24 February 2011. 
  17. ^ BBC E-mail vetting blocks MPs' sex debate 4 February 2003
  18. ^ BBC Software blocks MPs' Welsh e-mail 5 February 2003
  19. ^ a b c Sheerin, Jude (29 March 2010). "How spam filters dictated Canadian magazine's fate". BBC News. Retrieved 29 March 2010. 
  20. ^ Keyes, Ralph (2010). Unmentionables: From Family Jewels to Friendly Fire – What We Say Instead of What We Mean. John Murray.  
  21. ^ BBC E-mail filter blocks 'erection' 30 May 2006
  22. ^ Sam Jones Panto email falls foul of filth filter The Guardian 14 October 2004
  23. ^ Maher, Kris (26 April 2004). "Don't Let Spam Filters Snatch Your Resume". Career Journal. Archived from the original on 18 November 2007. Retrieved 11 February 2008. 
  24. ^ "Canada's The Beaver magazine renamed to end porn mix-up". Agence France-Presse. 12 January 2010. Retrieved 12 January 2010. 
  25. ^ "Black Country Councillor Caught up in Faggots Farce". Birmingham Mail. 24 February 2011. Retrieved 24 February 2011. 
  26. ^ "The word 'cock' is banned on RSPB's website". Daily Mail (London). 13 November 2012. Retrieved 13 November 2012. 
  27. ^ a b Moore, Matthew (2 September 2008). "The Clbuttic Mistake: When obscenity filters go wrong". The Daily Telegraph (London). Retrieved 4 April 2010. 
  28. ^ Frauenfelder, Mark (30 June 2008). "Homophobic news site changes athlete Tyson Gay to Tyson Homosexual". BoingBoing. Retrieved 22 December 2008. 
  29. ^
  30. ^ Gye, Hugo (20 December 2011). "What the D***ens is going on? Over-zealous censors filter out favourite TV names (and don't even think of watching an Arsenal game".  
  31. ^ Gibbs, Samuel (21 January 2014). "'"UK porn filter blocks game update that contained 'sex. The Guardian. London. Retrieved 21 January 2014. 

External links

This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.