World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Social accounting

Article Id: WHEBN0041158050
Reproduction Date:

Title: Social accounting  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: AccountAbility, Environmental audit, Social responsibility, Sustainability measurement, Director's Report
Collection:
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Publication
Date:
 

Social accounting

Social accounting (also known as [1]

Social accounting is commonly used in the context of business, or NGOs, charities, and government agencies may engage in social accounting. Social Accounting can also be used in conjunction with Community-Based Monitoring (CBM).

Social accounting emphasises the notion of corporate accountability. D. Crowther defines social accounting in this sense as "an approach to reporting a firm’s activities which stresses the need for the identification of socially relevant behaviour, the determination of those to whom the company is accountable for its social performance and the development of appropriate measures and reporting techniques."[2] It is an important step in helping companies independently develop CSR programs which are shown to be much more effective than government mandated CSR.[3]

Social accounting is often used as an natural environment. Sustainability accounting is often used to express the measuring and the quantitative analysis of social and economic sustainability.

Purpose

Social accounting challenges conventional accounting, in particular organizations, and thus artificially constraining the subject of accounting.

Social accounting, a largely normative concept, seeks to broaden the scope of accounting in the sense that it should:

  • concern itself with more than only economic events;
  • not be exclusively expressed in financial terms;
  • be accountable to a broader group of stakeholders;
  • broaden its purpose beyond reporting financial success.

It points to the fact that companies influence their external environment ( some times positively and many a times negatively) through their actions and should therefore account for these effects as part of their standard accounting practices. Social accounting is in this sense closely related to the economic concept of externality.

Social accounting offers an alternative account of significant economic entities. It has the "potential to expose the tension between pursuing economic profit and the pursuit of social and environmental objectives".[4]
The purpose of social accounting can be approached from two different angles, namely for management control purposes or accountability purposes.

Accountability vs authority enjoyed

Social accounting for accountability purposes is designed to support and facilitate the pursuit of society's objectives. These objectives can be manifold but can typically be described in terms of social and environmental desirability and sustainability. In order to make informed choices on these objectives, the flow of information in society in general, and in accounting in particular, needs to cater for democratic decision-making. In democratic systems, Gray argues, there must then be flows of information in which those controlling the resources provide accounts to society of their use of those resources: a system of corporate accountability.[5]

Society is seen to profit from implementing a social and environmental approach to accounting in a number of ways, e.g.:

  • Honoring stakeholders' rights of information;
  • Balancing corporate power with corporate responsibility;
  • Increasing transparency of corporate activity;
  • Identifying social and environmental costs of economic success.

Management control

Social accounting for the purpose of management control is designed to support and facilitate the achievement of an organization's own objectives.
Because social accounting is concerned with substantial self-reporting on a systemic level, individual reports are often referred to as social audits. The first complete internal model for social accounting and audit, 1981, was designed for social enterprises to help plan and measure their social, environmental and financial progress towards achieving their planned objectives.[6]

Organizations are seen to benefit from implementing social accounting practices in a number of ways, e.g.:[7]

  • Increased information for decision-making;
  • More accurate product or service costing;
  • Enhanced image management and Public Relations;
  • Identification of social responsibilities;
  • Identification of market development opportunities;
  • Maintaining legitimacy.

According to BITC the "process of reporting on responsible businesses performance to stakeholders" (i.e. social accounting) helps integrate such practices into business practices, as well as identifying future risks and opportunities.[8]

The management control view thus focuses on the individual organization.
Critics of this approach point out that the benign nature of companies is assumed. Here, responsibility, and accountability, is largely left in the hands of the organization concerned.[9]

Scope

Formal accountability

In social accounting the focus tends to be on larger organisations such as [10]

Social accounting also questions the reduction of all meaningful information to financial form. Financial data is seen as only one element of the accounting language.[11]

Self-reporting and third party audits

In most countries, existing legislation only regulates a fraction of accounting for socially relevant corporate activity. In consequence, most available social, environmental and sustainability reports are financial statements. While companies' efforts in this regard are usually commended, there seems to be a tension between voluntary reporting and accountability, for companies are likely to produce reports favouring their interests.[12]

The re-arrangement of social and environmental data companies already produce as part of their normal reporting practice into an independent social audit is called a silent or shadow account.

An alternative phenomenon is the creation of external social audits by groups or individuals independent of the accountable organisation and typically without its encouragement. External social audits thus also attempt to blur the boundaries between organisations and society and to establish social accounting as a fluid two-way communication process. Companies are sought to be held accountable regardless of their approval.[13] It is in this sense that external audits part with attempts to establish social accounting as an intrinsic feature of organisational behaviour. The reports of Social Audit Ltd in the 1970s on e.g. Tube Investments, Avon Rubber and Coalite and Chemical, laid the foundations for much of the later work on social audits.[14]

Reporting areas

Unlike in financial accounting, the matter of interest is by definition less clear-cut in social accounting; this is due to an aspired all-encompassing approach to corporate activity. It is generally agreed that social accounting will cover an organisation's relationship with the natural environment, its employees, and ethical issues concentrating upon consumers and products, as well as local and international communities. Other issues include corporate action on questions of ethnicity and gender.[10]

Audience

Social accounting supersedes the traditional audit audience, which is mainly composed of a company's [16]

Environmental accounting

Environmental accounting, which is a subset of social accounting, focuses on the cost structure and environmental performance of a company. It principally describes the preparation, presentation, and communication of information related to an organisation’s interaction with the natural environment. Although environmental accounting is most commonly undertaken as voluntary self-reporting by companies, third-party reports by government agencies, NGOs and other bodies posit to pressure for environmental accountability.

Accounting for impacts on the environment may occur within a company’s financial statements, relating to liabilities, commitments and contingencies for the remediation of contaminated lands or other financial concerns arising from pollution. Such reporting essentially expresses financial issues arising from environmental legislation. More typically, environmental accounting describes the reporting of quantitative and detailed environmental data within the non-financial sections of the annual report or in separate (including online) environmental reports. Such reports may account for pollution emissions, resources used, or wildlife habitat damaged or re-established.

In their reports, large companies commonly place primary emphasis on eco-efficiency, referring to the reduction of resource and energy use and waste production per unit of product or service. A complete picture which accounts for all inputs, outputs and wastes of the organisation, must not necessarily emerge. Whilst companies can often demonstrate great success in eco-efficiency, their ecological footprint, that is an estimate of total environmental impact, may move independently following changes in output.

Legislation for compulsory environmental reporting exists in some form e.g. in Denmark, Netherlands, Australia, the UK and Korea. In June 2012, the UK coalition government announced the introduction of mandatory carbon reporting, requiring all UK companies listed on the Main Market of the London Stock Exchange - around 1,100 of the UK’s largest listed companies - to report their greenhouse gas emissions every year. Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg confirmed that emission reporting rules would come into effect from April 2013 in his piece for The Guardian.[17][18] However, the date was eventually moved back to 1 October 2013.[19]

The United Nations has been highly involved in the adoption of environmental accounting practices, most notably in the United Nations Division for Sustainable Development publication "Environmental Management Accounting Procedures and Principles".[20]

Applications

Social accounting is a widespread practice in a number of large organisations in the United Kingdom. Royal Dutch Shell, BP, British Telecom, The Co-operative Bank, The Body Shop, and United Utilities all publish independently audited social and sustainability accounts.[21][22][23][24][25][26] In many instances the reports are produced in (partial or full) compliance with the sustainability reporting guidelines set by the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI).

public limited company to publish audited social accounts in the UK, starting in 1993.[27][28]

The website of the Centre for Social and Environmental Accounting Research contains a collection of exemplary reporting practices and social audits.

Areas

Companies and other organisations (such as NGOs) may publish annual corporate responsibility reports, in print or online. The reporting format can also include summary or overview documents for certain stakeholders, a corporate responsibility or sustainability section on its corporate website, or integrate social accounting into its annual report and accounts.[8]

Companies may seek to adopt a social accounting format that is audience specific and appropriate. For example, H&M, asks stakeholders how they would like to receive reports on its website; Vodafone publishes separate reports for 11 of its operating companies as well as publishing an internal report in 2005; Weyerhaeuser produced a tabloid-size, four-page mini-report in addition to its full sustainability report.[29]

History

Modern forms of social accounting first produced widespread interest in the 1970s. Its concepts received serious consideration from professional and academic accounting bodies, e.g. the Accounting Standards Board's predecessor, the American Accounting Association and the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.[30][31][32] Business-representative bodies, e.g. the Confederation of British Industry, likewise approached the issue.[33]

In 1981 Freer Spreckley produced a short book entitled Social Audit - A Management Tool for Co-operative Working[34] designed as an internal organisational social accounting and audit model specifically for social enterprises who wished to measure their social, environmental and financial performance. This was the basis for the Co-operative Bank and Shell Corporation's social performance reports in the UK and subsequently many other private sector companies social responsibility reporting.

Abt Associates, the American consultancy firm, is one of the most cited early examples of businesses that experimented with social accounting. In the 1970s Abt Associates conducted a series of social audits incorporated into its annual reports. The social concerns addressed included "productivity, contribution to knowledge, employment security, fairness of employment opportunities, health, education and self-development, physical security, transportation, recreation, and environment".[35] The social audits expressed Abt Associates performance in this areas in financial terms and thus aspired to determine the company's net social impact in balance sheet form.[36] Other examples of early applications include Laventhol and Horwath, then a reputable accounting firm, and the First National Bank of Minneapolis (now U.S. Bancorp).[37]

Yet social accounting practices were only rarely codified in legislation; notable exceptions include the French bilan social and the British 2006 Companies Act.[38][39] Interest in social accounting cooled off in the 1980s and was only resurrected in the mid-1990s, partly nurtured by growing ecological and environmental awareness.[40]

See also

References

Notes

  1. ^ R.H. Gray, D.L. Owen & K.T. Maunders, Corporate Social Reporting: Accounting and accountability (Hemel Hempstead: Prentice Hall, 1987)p. IX.
  2. ^ D. Crowther, Social and Environmental Accounting (London: Financial Times Prentice Hall, 2000), p. 20.
  3. ^
  4. ^ Gray R.H., D.L. Owen & C. Adams (1996) Accounting and Accountability: Changes and Challenges in Corporate Social and Environmental Reporting (London: Prentice Hall), Ch 1
  5. ^ Ibid, esp Ch 3.
  6. ^ Freer Spreckley, Social Audit Toolkit
  7. ^ See R.H. Gray, 'Current Developments and Trends in Social and Environmental Auditing, Reporting & Attestation' , International Journal of Auditing 4(3) (2000): pp247-268; Crowther, Social and Environmental Accounting, esp Ch 2.
  8. ^ a b Corporate responsibility reporting - Business in the Community
  9. ^ Gray, 'Current Developments', p. 17.
  10. ^ a b Gray et al., Accountability, Ch 1.
  11. ^ See M.R. Mathews,'Towards a Mega-Theory of Accounting' in: Gray and Guthrie, Social Accounting, Mega Accounting and Beyond: A Festschrift in Honour of MR Mathews (CSEAR Publishing, 2007).
  12. ^
  13. ^ Gray, 'Thirty Years of Social Accounting', p. 10.
  14. ^ Ibid, p. 9.
  15. ^ Crowther, Social and Environmental Accounting, p. 19.
  16. ^ Gray, 'Thirty Years of Social Accounting'.
  17. ^
  18. ^ Guide to UK Mandatory Carbon Reporting. http://ecometrica.com/products/our-impacts/mandatory-carbon-reporting/
  19. ^ http://ecometrica.com/products/our-impacts/mandatory-carbon-reporting/
  20. ^ Environmental Management Accounting Procedures and Principles (2002)
  21. ^ Shell Sustainability Report 2007: http://www.shell.com/static/responsible_energy/downloads/sustainability_reports/shell_sustainability_report_2007.pdf
  22. ^ BP Sustainability Reports: http://www.bp.com/sectiongenericarticle.do?categoryId=6914&contentId=7042803
  23. ^ BT Society & Environment Report: http://www.btplc.com/Societyandenvironment/Socialandenvironmentreport/index.aspx
  24. ^ The Co-operative Bank Sustainability Reporting: http://www.co-operativebank.co.uk/servlet/Satellite?c=Page&cid=1168506355583&pagename=Corp/Page/tplCorp
  25. ^ The Body Shop Values Report 2007: http://valuesreport.thebodyshop.net/index.asp?lvl1=0&lvl2=0&lvl3=0&lvl4=0
  26. ^ United Utilities Sustainable Development: http://www.unitedutilities.com/?OBH=5349
  27. ^
  28. ^ See C. Dey, 'Social accounting at Traidcraft plc: A struggle for the meaning of fair trade', Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 20(3) (2007): pp.423 - 445.
  29. ^ Ethical Corporation: Report Reviews - Reporting review of the year – Corporate responsibility reporting – The best of times, the worst of times
  30. ^ See Accounting Standards Committee, The Corporate Report (London: ICAEW, 1975.)
  31. ^ American Accounting Association, 'Report of the Committee on Human Resource Accounting', The Accounting Review Supplement to Vol. XLVIII.
  32. ^ American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, The Measurement of Corporate Social Performance (New York: AICPA, 1977).
  33. ^ Confederation of British Industry. The Responsibility of the British Public Company (London: CBI, 1971).
  34. ^ Freer Spreckley, Social Audit - A Management Tool for Co-operative Working.
  35. ^ Abt Associates Annual Report and Social Audit 1974, quoted in D. Blake, W. Frederick, M. Myers, Social Auditing, (New York: Praeger Publishers, 1976), p.149.
  36. ^ R. A. Bauer and D. H. Fenn, What is a corporate social audit?, Harvard Business Review, 1973, pp.42-43.
  37. ^ Blake et al., Social Auditing, p. 149. '
  38. ^ Gray, 'Current Developments', p. 5.
  39. ^ Press Release - Changes to the Companies Act 2006
  40. ^ Gray, Thirty Years of Social Accounting, p. 9.

Further reading

  • Amat, O., & Gowthorpe, C. (2004). Creative accounting: Nature, incidence and ethical issues, Economics Working Papers 749, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.

External links

  • Accounting for Value
  • Accounting for Sustainability
  • Centre for Social and Environmental Accounting Research
  • Institute for Social and Ethical AccountAbility
  • Global Reporting Initiative
  • Traidcraft plc
  • NEC Promotion of Environmental Management
  • Environmental Management Accounting International Website
  • United Nations Environmental Accounting
  • (http://www.socialauditnetwork.org.uk/ Social Audit Network)
  • The Institute for Social Accountability
  • www.communitymonitoring.org (English and Dari/Farsi) - Toolkit on Community-Based Monitoring
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
 
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
 
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.
 


Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.