World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Weak two bid

Article Id: WHEBN0003495115
Reproduction Date:

Title: Weak two bid  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Preempt, Glossary of contract bridge terms, Multi two diamonds, Ogust convention, Bidding system
Collection:
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Publication
Date:
 

Weak two bid

The weak two bid is a common treatment used in the game of contract bridge, where an opening bid of two diamonds, hearts or spades signifies a weak hand with a long suit.[1] It is used in combination with the strong two clubs bid and is a form of preemptive bid. The term refers to an opening bid, and is not to be confused with the "weak jump overcall", which denotes a similar type of hand, but is bid over an opponent's opening bid.

The requirements for a weak two bid may vary by partnership agreement. The most common treatment is that it requires:

  • any good suit of exactly six cards in diamonds, hearts or spades; a longer suit should make a higher preemptive opening bid
  • no side five-card suit or four-card major
  • in modern tournament play, the announced range for a weak two-bid is usually 5-10, 5-11, 6-10 or 6-11 HCP;[2] for some a hand with six in a suit plus 11 points may be strong enough for a bid at the one level; see Rule of 20

What constitutes a "good" suit is again a matter of partnership agreement. The American Contract Bridge League recommends that the opener hold at least two of the top three or three of the top five cards in the suit (that is, either K-Q or Q-J-10 or better). Others recommend at least three honors (J-Q-K).

Contents

  • History 1
  • Responses 2
  • Common Variations 3
  • Parallel Twos 4
  • See also 5
  • References 6

History

A prototype of the weak two was used in auction bridge, and the principle was attested as early as 1910 by J.B. Elwell.[3] It was incorporated into the Vanderbilt Club system. In early 1940s, Howard Schenken developed the modern weak two-bid along lines similar to Vanderbilt's.[1]

In Charles Goren's original bidding system, when a player opened the bidding with two of a suit, this signified that the player held a very strong hand. (This later became known as the strong two bid.) Later players found it more effective to reserve only the conventional two clubs opening; to show a strong hand. That left the room for opening bids of 2, 2, or 2 to show a weak hand with a six-card suit. This became known as the weak two bid. In some systems, a bid of 2 shows a strong hand with a five-card suit, and a bid of 2 shows a hand that is similarly strong, but balanced. These alternate versions are less common.

Responses

Standard American and Standard English Acol responses to weak twos are as follows...

  • A raise of the bid suit extends the preempt, and is to play. The weak two bidder does not bid again.
  • A bid of 2NT is 17+ artificial forcing enquiry.
  • A new suit is forcing and at least invitational.

This is known as RONF for raise only non-forcing bid.

After a 2NT enquiry.

    • A bid of three of any suit other than the suit of the "weak two" bid shows a "feature" (typically either an ace or a king) in the named suit and maximum.
    • A bid of three of the suit of the "weak two" bid denies a "feature" in any other suit and is minimum.
    • A bid of 3NT shows a maximum without a feature.

Common Variations

Some pairs play a feature shows a stop for NT.

Weak Pulls

  • A new suit at the lowest level shows a weak hand with a long suit and is to play. The weak two bidder does not bid again.

Ogust

  • When using the Ogust convention, the following alertable responses apply:
    • 3 shows a "minimum" hand and a "poor" suit.
    • 3 shows a "minimum" hand and a "good" suit.
    • 3 shows a "maximum" hand and a "poor" suit.
    • 3 shows a "maximum" hand and a "good" suit.
    • 3NT shows A-K-Q of the preempt suit.
      Here, the definitions of "minimum" and "maximum" hands and "poor" and "good" suits are matters of partnership agreement.
    • A range of seven HCP or less for a "minimum" hand and eight HCP or more for a "maximum" hand is fairly typical.
    • Since "strict" preempts usually show either K-Q or better or Q-J-10 or better, partners who play "strict" preempts typically regard a "good" suit as something more (K-Q-J or better, for example). On the other hand, partners who are less strict in their preempts might define a "good" suit to have either K-Q or better or Q-J-10 or better and a "poor" suit to have anything less.
      There are several variations on the Ogust convention. Ogust's original definition, for example, had the swapped responses in the red suits and did not include the 3NT response. The responses shown here, however, are now pretty much standard.

Parallel Twos

Playing Parallel Twos an opening 2 shows five hearts 7-11 HCP, 2 shows five spades 7-11 HCP. The 2 and 2 opener's are referred to as Parallel Twos because they are played in parallel with the regular six card weak twos in hearts and spades. You can play them in any bidding system Acol, SAYC, Precision, Blue Club etc. See the eBook "Parallel Twos For You" N.Jones June 2014.

See also

References

  1. ^ a b Manley, Brent, Editor;  
  2. ^ Manley, Brent, Editor;  
  3. ^ History of Weak Two, Chris Ryall website
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
 
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
 
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.
 


Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.