#jsDisabledContent { display:none; } My Account |  Register |  Help

# Budget constraint

Article Id: WHEBN0000271310
Reproduction Date:

 Title: Budget constraint Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia Language: English Subject: Collection: Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia Publication Date:

### Budget constraint

Budget constraint, where A=\frac{m}{P_y} and B=\frac{m}{P_x}

A budget constraint represents all the combinations of goods and services that a consumer may purchase given current prices within his or her given income. Consumer theory uses the concepts of a budget constraint and a preference map to analyze consumer choices. Both concepts have a ready graphical representation in the two-good case.

## Contents

• Uses 1
• Individual choice 1.1
• International economics 1.2
• Many goods 2
• Notes 3
• References 5

## Uses

### Individual choice

An individual should consume at (Qx, Qy).

Consumer behaviour is a maximisation problem. It means making the most of our limited resources to maximise our utility. As consumers are insatiable, and utility functions grow with quantity, the only thing that limits our consumption is our own budget.[1]

An individual consumer should choose to consume goods at the point where the most preferred available indifference curve on their preference map is tangent to their budget constraint. That is, the indifference curve tangent to the budget constraint represents the maximum utility obtained utilizing the entire budget of the consumer. The tangent point (the xy coordinate) represents the amount of goods x and y the consumer should purchase to fully utilize their budget to obtain maximum utility.[2] A line connecting all points of tangency between the indifference curve and the budget constraint is called the expansion path.[3]

All two dimensional budget constraints are generalized into the equation:

P_x x+P_y y=m

Where:

• m= money income allocated to consumption (after saving and borrowing)
• P_x= the price of a specific good
• P_y= the price of all other goods
• x= amount purchased of a specific good
• y= amount purchased of all other goods

The equation can be rearranged to represent the shape of the curve on a graph:

y= (m/P_y)-(P_x/P_y) x, where (m/P_y) is the y-intercept and (-P_x/P_y) is the slope, representing a downward sloping budget line.

The factors that can shift the budget line are a change in income (m), a change in the price of a specific good (P_x), or a change in the price of all other goods (P_y).

### International economics

Point X is unobtainable given the current "budget" constraints on production.

A production-possibility frontier is a constraint in some ways analogous to a budget constraint, showing limitations on a country's production of multiple goods based on the limitation of available factors of production. Under autarky this is also the limitation of consumption by individuals in the country. However, the benefits of international trade are generally demonstrated through allowance of a shift in the consumption-possibility frontiers of each trade partner which allows access to a more appealing indifference curve. In the "toolbox" Hecksher-Ohlin and Krugman models of international trade, the budget constraint of the economy (its CPF) is determined by the terms-of-trade (TOT) as a downward-sloped line with slope equal to those TOTs of the economy. (The TOTs are given by the price ratio Px/Py, where x is the exportable commodity and y is the importable).

## Many goods

While low level demonstrations of budget constraints are often limited to ←two good situations which provide easy graphical representation, it is possible to demonstrate the relationship between multiple goods through a budget constraint.

In such a case, assuming there are n\, goods, called x_i\, for i=1,\dots,n\,, that the price of good x_i\, is denoted by p_i\,, and if \,W\, is the total amount that may be spent, then the budget constraint is:

\sum_{i=1}^np_ix_i\leq W.

Further, if the consumer spends his income entirely, the budget constraint binds:

\sum_{i=1}^np_ix_i=W.

In this case, the consumer cannot obtain an additional unit of good x_i\, without giving up some other good. For example, he could purchase an additional unit of good x_i\, by giving up p_i/p_j\, units of good x_j.\,

## Notes

1. ^ http://www.policonomics.com/budget-constraint/
2. ^ Lipsey (1975). p 182.
3. ^ Salvatore, Dominick (1989). Schaum's outline of theory and problems of managerial economics, McGraw-Hill, ISBN 978-0-07-054513-7

## References

• Lipsey, Richard G. (1975). An introduction to positive economics (fourth ed.). Weidenfeld & Nicolson. pp. 214–7.
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.

Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.