World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Metadata Object Description Schema

Article Id: WHEBN0006712013
Reproduction Date:

Title: Metadata Object Description Schema  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Comparison of reference management software, MLIB10, Schema crosswalk, Refbase, List of SIMILE projects
Collection: Bibliography File Formats, Library Cataloging and Classification, Metadata Standards
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia

Metadata Object Description Schema

Metadata Object Description Schema
Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS)
Status Published
Year started 2002
Latest version 3.5
July 2013
Related standards MARC
Domain Bibliography
Abbreviation MODS
Website /mods/

The Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS) is an XML-based bibliographic description schema developed by the United States Library of Congress' Network Development and Standards Office. MODS was designed as a compromise between the complexity of the MARC format used by libraries and the extreme simplicity of Dublin Core metadata.


  • About MODS 1
    • History and development 1.1
    • Relationship to MARC 1.2
    • Advantages 1.3
    • Maintenance board 1.4
  • See also 2
  • References 3
  • External links 4

About MODS

History and development

The Library of Congress' Network Development and MARC Standards Office, with interested experts, developed the Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS) in 2002 for a bibliographic element set that may be used for a variety of purposes, and particularly for library applications. As an XML schema it is intended to be able to carry selected data from existing MARC 21 records as well as to enable the creation of original resource description records. It includes a subset of MARC fields and uses language-based tags rather than numeric ones, in some cases regrouping elements from the MARC 21 bibliographic format. MODS was first announced for trial use in June 2002. As of July 2013 it is at version 3.5.[1]

The number of users of MODS is unknown. Implementers are encouraged to register their uses of MODS in the implementation registry on the official MODS website. To date there are about 35 projects listed in the registry, although it is assumed that many others are making use of the standard. Users are primarily operating in the area of digital libraries, and some of the registered uses are in digital library projects at the Library of Congress.

Relationship to MARC

The MODS record has been designed to carry key data elements from the MARC record but does not define all of the MARC fields and does not use the field and subfield tagging from the MARC standard. There are data elements in MODS that are not compatible with the MARC record so there is some loss translating from MARC to MODS and from MODS to MARC. There is no commitment on the part of the Library of Congress to maintain compatibility between the two metadata formats beyond what is convenient to the community of MODS users.


The use of MODS provides several advantages compared to other metadata schemas:[2]

  • High compatibility with existing resource descriptions
  • Less detail than MARC so various internal record element sets can be mapped to MODS
  • Item descriptions from outside in DC and other simpler formats can be mapped and enhanced

Maintenance board

Revisions to the schema are suggested and discussed on the MODS listserv, and approved by the MODS Editorial Committee. The MODS/MADS Editorial Committee is an international group of volunteers responsible for maintaining editorial control over MODS and MADS and their accompanying documentation as well as for the MODS and MADS XML schemas.[3] The Library of Congress carries out the application of approved changes to the schema and maintains the official web site for the standard. There is no formal standards body involved in the MODS schema at this time.

See also


  1. ^ "MODS 3.5 released". Retrieved 2014-03-17. 
  2. ^ Gueguen, Gretchen (2 July 2010). "MODS and MADS: current implementations and future directions". LITA Blog. Library and Information Technology Association. Retrieved 25 August 2014. MODS advantages: compatibility with what they already have less detail than MARC so you can map MARC other standards are easy to map to MODS as well (easier than MARC at least) 
  3. ^ "MODS/MADS Editorial Committee". Retrieved 2011-08-02. 

External links

  • Official website
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.