World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Mismatch loss

Article Id: WHEBN0017231324
Reproduction Date:

Title: Mismatch loss  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Insertion loss, Reflection coefficient, Return loss, Standing wave ratio, Telecommunications engineering
Collection: Telecommunications Engineering
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia

Mismatch loss

Mismatch loss in transmission line theory is the amount of power expressed in decibels that will not be available on the output due to impedance mismatches and signal reflections. A transmission line that is properly terminated, that is, terminated with the same impedance as that of the characteristic impedance of the transmission line, will have no reflections and therefore no mismatch loss. Mismatch loss represents the amount of power wasted in the system. It can also be thought of as the amount of power gained if the system was perfectly matched. Impedance matching is an important part of RF system design; however, in practice there will likely be some degree of mismatch loss.[1] In real systems, relatively little loss is due to mismatch loss and is often on the order of 1dB.


  • Calculation 1
  • Sources of mismatch loss 2
  • Mismatch error 3
  • See also 4
  • References 5


Mismatch loss (ML) is the ratio of incident power to the difference between incident and reflected power:

Figure 1. Simple circuit showing characteristic impedance Zo and the load impedance ZL. In a perfectly matched system ZL=Zo, and there is no mismatch loss.
ML_\mathrm{dB} = 10 \log_{10} \bigg(\frac{P_i}{P_i-P_r}\bigg) \,
P_r=P_i - P_d\,


P_i = incident power
P_r = reflected power
P_d = delivered power (also called the accepted power)

The fraction of incident power delivered to the load is

Figure 2. Simple circuit showing incident power, Pi, on a load. The reflected power will be the difference between Pi and the power delivered, Pd.

where \rho is the magnitude of the reflection coefficient. Note that as the reflection coefficient approaches zero, power to the load is maximized.

If the reflection coefficient is known, mismatch can be calculated by

ML_\mathrm{dB} = - 10 \log_{10} \bigg(1-\rho^2\bigg) \,

In terms of the voltage standing wave ratio (VSWR):

ML_\mathrm{dB} = - 10 \log_{10} \bigg(1-\bigg(\frac{VSWR-1}{VSWR+1}\bigg)^2\bigg) \,


Sources of mismatch loss

Any component of the transmission line that has an input and output will contribute to the overall mismatch loss of the system. For example, in mixers mismatch loss occurs when there is an impedance mismatch between the RF port and IF port of the mixer.[3] This is one of the principal reasons for losses in mixers. Likewise, a large amount of the loss in amplifiers comes from the mismatch between the input and output. Consequently, not all of the available power generated by the amplifier gets transferred to the load.[4] This is most important in antenna systems where mismatch loss in the transmitting and receiving antenna directly contributes to the losses the system—including the system noise figure. Other common RF system components such as filters, attenuators, splitters, and combiners will generate some amount of mismatch loss. While completely eliminating mismatch loss in these components is near impossible, mismatch loss contributions by each component can be minimized by selecting quality components for use in a well designed system.

Mismatch error

[5] If there are two or more components in cascade as is often the case, the resultant mismatch loss is not only due to the mismatches from the individual components, but also from how the reflections from each component combine with each other. The overall mismatch loss cannot be calculated by just adding up the individual loss contributions from each component. The difference between the sum of the mismatch loss in each component and total mismatch loss due to the interactions of the reflections is known as mismatch error. Depending on how the multiple reflections combine, the overall system loss may be lower or higher than the sum of the mismatch loss from each component. Mismatch error occurs in pairs as the signal reflects off of each mismatched component. So for the example in Figure 3, there are mismatch errors generated by each pair of components.[6] The mismatch uncertainty increases as the frequency increases, and in wide-band applications. The phasing of the reflections makes it particularly harder to model.

The general case for calculating mismatch error (ME) is:

Figure 3. Simple circuit showing multiple reflections due to more than 1 mismatched device.
ME_\mathrm{dB} = 20 \log_{10} \bigg(1-\rho_1\rho_2\,e^{-j2\theta}\bigg) \,

where \theta is the complex phase change due to the second reflection

See also


  1. ^ Daniels, David J. (2004). Ground penetrating radar (2nd Edition). Institution of Engineering and Technology. ISBN 978-0-86341-360-5
  2. ^ Lo YT and Lee SW 1988 Antenna handbook: Theory, Applications, and Design
  3. ^ Carr, Joseph J. (2002). RF components and circuits. Oxford: Newnes. ISBN 0-7506-4844-9
  4. ^ Skolnik, Merrill I. (2001). Introduction to radar systems (3rd Edition). New York: McGraw-Hill. ISBN 0-07-288138-0
  5. ^ White, Joseph F. (2004). High frequency techniques: An introduction to RF and microwave engineering. Hoboken: Wiley. ISBN 0-471-45591-1
  6. ^ Briggs, John N. (2004). Target detection by marine radar. Institution of Engineering and Technology. ISBN 978-0-86341-359-9
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.