World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Consistent Field

Article Id: WHEBN0002066262
Reproduction Date:

Title: Consistent Field  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Electronic correlation, GAMESS (US), Quantum chemistry composite methods, K·p perturbation theory, Tight binding
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia

Consistent Field

Multi-configurational self-consistent field (MCSCF) is a method in quantum chemistry used to generate qualitatively correct reference states of molecules in cases where Hartree–Fock and density functional theory are not adequate (e.g., for molecular ground states which are quasi-degenerate with low lying excited states or in bond breaking situations). It uses a linear combination of configuration state functions (CSF) or configuration determinants to approximate the exact electronic wavefunction of an atom or molecule. In an MCSCF calculation, the set of coefficients of both the CSFs or determinants and the basis functions in the molecular orbitals are varied to obtain the total electronic wavefunction with the lowest possible energy. This method can be considered a combination between configuration interaction (where the molecular orbitals are not varied but the expansion of the wave function) and Hartree–Fock (where there is only one determinant but the molecular orbitals are varied).

MCSCF wave functions are often used as reference states for Multireference configuration interaction (MRCI) or multi-reference perturbation theories like complete active space perturbation theory (CASPT2). These methods can deal with extremely complex chemical situations and, if computing power permits, may be used to reliably calculate molecular ground- and excited states if all other methods fail.


For the simplest single bond, found in the H2 molecule, molecular orbitals can always be written in terms of two functions χiA and χiB (which are atomic orbitals with small corrections) located at the two nuclei,

\varphi_i = N_i(\chi_{iA} \pm \chi_{iB}), \,

where Ni is a normalization constant. The ground state wavefunction for H2 at the equilibrium geometry is dominated by the configuration (φ1)2, which means the molecular orbital φ1 is nearly doubly occupied. The Hartree–Fock model assumes it is doubly occupied, which leads to a total wavefunction of

\Phi_1 = \varphi_1(\mathbf{r}_1)\varphi_1(\mathbf{r}_2)\Theta_{2,0},

where Θ2,0 is the singlet (S = 0) spin function for two electrons. The molecular orbitals in this case φ1 are taken as sums of 1s atomic orbitals on both atoms, namely N1(1sA + 1sB). Expanding the above equation into atomic orbitals yields

\Phi_1 = N_1^2 \left[ 1s_A(\mathbf{r}_1)1s_A(\mathbf{r}_2) + 1s_A(\mathbf{r}_1)1s_B(\mathbf{r}_2) + 1s_B(\mathbf{r}_1)1s_A(\mathbf{r}_2) + 1s_B(\mathbf{r}_1)1s_B(\mathbf{r}_2) \right] \Theta_{2,0}.

This Hartree–Fock model gives a reasonable description of H2 around the equilibrium geometry - about 0.735Å for the bond length (compared to a 0.746Å experimental value) and 84 kcal/mol for the bond energy (exp. 109 kcal/mol). This is typical of the HF model, which usually describes closed shell systems around their equilibrium geometry quite well. At large separations, however, the terms describing both electrons located at one atom remain, which corresponds to dissociation to H+ + H, which has a much larger energy than H + H. Therefore, the persisting presence of ionic terms leads to an unphysical solution in this case.

Consequently, the HF model cannot be used to describe dissociation processes with open shell products. The most straightforward solution to this problem is introducing coefficients in front of the different terms in Ψ1:

\Psi_1 = C_\text{Ion}\Phi_\text{Ion} + C_\text{Cov}\Phi_\text{Cov},

which forms the basis for the valence bond description of chemical bonds. With the coefficients CIon and CCov varying, the wave function will have the correct form, with CIon=0 for the separated limit and CIon comparable to CCov at equilibrium. Such a description, however, uses non-orthogonal basis functions, which complicates its mathematical structure. Instead, multiconfiguration is achieved by using orthogonal molecular orbitals. After introducing an anti-bonding orbital

\phi_2 = N_2 (1s_A - 1s_B),\,

the total wave function of H2 can be written as a linear combination of configurations built from bonding and anti-bonding orbitals:

\Psi_{MC} = C_1\Phi_1 + C_2\Phi_2,

where Φ2 is the electronic configuration (φ2)2. In this multiconfigurational description of the H2 chemical bond, C1 = 1 and C2 = 0 close to equilibrium, and C1 will be comparable to C2 for large separations.[1]

Complete active space SCF

A particularly important MCSCF approach is the complete active space SCF method (CASSCF), where the linear combination of CSFs includes all that arise from a particular number of electrons in a particular number of orbitals (also known as full-optimized reaction space (FORS-MCSCF)). For example, one might define CASSCF(11,8) for the molecule, NO, where the 11 valence electrons are distributed between all configurations that can be constructed from 8 molecular orbitals.[2][3]

Restricted active space SCF

Since the number of CSFs quickly increases with the number of active orbitals, along with the computational cost, it may be desirable to use a smaller set of CSFs. One way to make this selection is to restrict the number of electrons in certain subspaces, done in the restricted active space SCF method (RASSCF). One could, for instance, allow only single and double excitations from some strongly-occupied subset of active orbitals, or restrict the number of electrons to at most 2 in another subset of active orbitals.

See also


  1. ^  
  2. ^ Jensen, Frank (2007). Introduction to Computational Chemistry. Chichester, England: John Wiley and Sons. pp. 133–158.  
  3. ^ Cramer, Christopher J. (2002). Essentials of Computational Chemistry. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. pp. 191–232.  

Further reading

This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.