World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Capital Purchase Program

Article Id: WHEBN0020540328
Reproduction Date:

Title: Capital Purchase Program  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Subprime mortgage crisis, 2009 Supervisory Capital Assessment Program, Global financial crisis in October 2008, Troubled Asset Relief Program, Debt overhang
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia

Capital Purchase Program

The Capital Purchase Program or CPP is a preferred stock and equity warrant purchase program conducted by the US Treasury's Office of Financial Stability as part of Troubled Assets Relief Program (aka, TARP). According to the first congressionally mandated oversight report published by GAO,[1] "[TARP's] primary focus was expected to be the purchase of mortgage-backed securities (MBS) and whole loans... [but] within 2 weeks of enactment... the Treasury announced that it would make $250 billion of the $700 billion available to U.S. financial institutions through purchases of preferred stock." Because preferred stock is similar to debt in that it gets paid before common stock, some economists have questioned whether the buying of preferred stock by the CPP will be effective in getting banks to lend.[2][3] Other economist have argued that the capital purchases represent a taxpayer subsidy of unsecured creditors.[4] A review of investor presentations and conference calls by executives of some two dozen US-based banks by the New York Times found that "few [banks] cited lending as a priority. An overwhelming majority saw the bailout program as a no-strings-attached windfall that could be used to pay down debt, acquire other businesses or invest for the future." [5] In a letter to Congress the Director-designate of the National Economic Council Larry Summers said that the Obama administration would place tighter controls on how CPP funds could be used. In particular, the second $350 billion would include restrictions on the payment of common stock dividends and executive compensation. Professor Summers also promised greater disclosure and more attempts to tie the funds to foreclosure mitigation efforts.[6]

On January 16, 2009 the Congressional Budget Office estimated that of the first $247 billion of securities purchased represented 26 percent ($64 billion) subsidy to the banks receiving funds.[7] In his speech on February 10, 2009, the new Secretary of the Treasury Timothy Geithner announced the Capital Assistance Program. This signaled an end to the capital purchase program.[8]

A Government Accountability Office (GAO) report from March 2012 gave further details, stating "As of January 31, 2012, the Department of the Treasury (Treasury) had received $211.5 billion from its CPP investments, exceeding the $204.9 billion it had disbursed. Of that amount, $16.7 billion remains outstanding, and most of these investments were concentrated in a relatively small number of institutions. In particular, as of January 31, 2012, 25 institutions accounted for $11.2 billion, or 67 percent, of outstanding investments. As of November 30, 2011, Treasury estimated that CPP would have a lifetime income of $13.5 billion after all institutions exited the program."[9]


By March 31, 2009 four banks out of over five hundred had returned their preferred stock obligations. None of the publicly traded banks had yet bought back their warrants owned by the U.S. Treasury by March 31, 2009.[10] According to the terms of the U.S. Treasury's investment, the banks returning funds can either negotiate to buy back the warrants at fair market value, or the U.S. Treasury can sell the warrants to third party investors as soon as feasible. Warrants are call options that add to the number of shares of stock outstanding if they are exercised for a profit. The American Bankers Association (ABA) has lobbied congress to cancel the warrants owned by taxpayers. The call them an "onerous exit fee."[11] Yet, if the Capital Purchase Program warrants of Goldman Sachs are representative, then the Capital Purchase Program warrants were worth between $5 billion and $24 billion as of May 1, 2009. Thus canceling the CPP warrants amounts to a $5-billion-to-$24-billion subsidy to the banking industry at taxpayers' expense.[12] While the ABA wants the CPP warrants to be written off by taxpayers, Goldman Sachs does not hold that view. A representative of Goldman Sachs was quoted as saying "We think that taxpayers should expect a decent return on their investment and look forward to being able to provide just that when we are permitted to return the TARP money." [13]

First nine financial institutions

Nine financial institutions received funds on October 28, 2008. These are:


The following is a list of 42 other participants in the CPP through purchases made on 14 November 2008 and 21 November 2008:


  1. ^ GA0 Report GAO-09-161 published 12/02/2008
  2. ^ "Common (Stock) Sense about Risk-Shifting and Bank Bailouts". December 29, 2009. Retrieved January 21, 2009. 
  3. ^ "Debt Overhang and Bank Bailouts". February 2, 2009. Retrieved February 2, 2009. 
  4. ^ Pietro Veronesi and Luigi Zingales"Paulson's Gift". Working Paper, University of Chicago. November 5, 2008. Retrieved February 2, 2009. 
  5. ^ McIntire, Mike. Bailout Is a Windfall to Banks, if Not to Borrowers. New York Times January 17, 2009. [1]
  6. ^ The Wall Street Journal . 
  7. ^ "The Troubled Asset Relief Program Report on Transactions Through December 31, 2008". CBO. January 16, 2009. Retrieved January 26, 2009. 
  8. ^ "FACT SHEET FINANCIAL STABILITY PLAN". U.S. Treasury. February 10, 2009. Retrieved March 11, 2009. 
  9. ^ "Capital Purchase Program Revenues Have Exceeded Investments, but Concerns about Outstanding Investments Remain". CBO. March 1, 2012. Retrieved October 4, 2012. 
  10. ^ SIGTARP, (2009), Office of the Special Inspector General for the Troubled Asset Relief Program, Quarterly Report to Congress: April 21, 2009, accessed online on May 5, 2009, at
  11. ^ Damian Paletta and Deborah Solomon, April 22, 2009, “Financial Firms Lobby to Cut Cost of TARP Exit,” accessed online on April 27, 2009 at
  12. ^ "The Goldman Sachs Warrants". May 7, 2009.  
  13. ^ John Carney, Apr. 23, 2009, “Goldman Sachs Is NOT Lobbying to Expunge the TARP Warrants,” accessed online on May 1, 2009 [2]
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.