World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Technology Across the Curriculum

Article Id: WHEBN0020760937
Reproduction Date:

Title: Technology Across the Curriculum  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Information technology education, George Mason University
Collection: George Mason University, Information Technology Education
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Publication
Date:
 

Technology Across the Curriculum

The Technology Across the Curriculum program at

  1. ^ See, for example, Claudia A. Perry, "Information Technology and the Curriculum: A Status Report," Educause Quarterly, Number 4 (2004), pp. 32-33. Perry calls the program "impressive" and "highly recognized" and describes its structure in some detail.
  2. ^ See as well David Gregory and William J. Nixon, "The Instruction Commons: an information literacy initiative at Iowa State University," Library Review, Vol. 52, Number 9 (2003), p. 430. According to the authors, "The Technology Across the Curriculum (TAC) program has received national attention for its innovative approach to integrating IT throughout the entire liberal arts curriculum at GMU." For a longer list of publications related to the TAC program, see the TAC Bibliography.
  3. ^ http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/EQM0041.pdf
  4. ^ http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/pub7006i.pdf See p. 101 in particular.
  5. ^ http://www.stockholmchallenge.se/data Search on Category=Education, Year=2000, and Status=Finalists, Winners.
  6. ^ November 2000 - Governor Honors TAC Program with Technology Award
  7. ^ Systemic Progress in Teaching and Learning 2001 Award Winners | Professional Development | EDUCAUSE
  8. ^ Western Civilization Webography

References

Another key element of TAC's "programmatic" nature is the emphasis on impact. The program has attempted over the years to gauge the impact it has had on the undergraduate curriculum and to keep track of the number of departments, courses, faculty, and students who are in some way affected by the program itself. The faculty members and departments are those who have been involved in TAC projects, and the students have taken courses that incorporate assignments advancing student technology skills as a result of TAC funding. The impact of a project can also influence whether the project receives funding, since one of the goals of the program is to be as comprehensive as possible. When a course that is a university requirement incorporates a new technology assignment (or assignments) as part of the TAC program, then almost every student at the university will complete that assignment, and those students will gain the technology skills inherent to the assignment. For example, History 100 (Western Civilization) is a required course at GMU, and all students who cannot place out of the course need to take it. The Western Civilization Webography project teaches students how to evaluate Internet sources based on their Authority, Accuracy, Objectivity, Currency, Coverage, Quality, etc.[8] Students work collaboratively to review Web-based resources relevant to the course (and that might be useful for a later writing assignment in the course), and the students enter their review into a searchable database. Students are learning crucial skills in Information literacy, and they are also learning how information is stored in a database to make it useful for later searching and retrieval. The TAC program can then feel confident that the vast majority of students at the university have received training in those crucial skills. Similarly, if Communication 104 (Presenting with Technology) is a university or college requirement, then most students will receive training in several of the IT Skills: Electronic Collaboration, Electronic Documents, Technology-Enhanced Presentations, Electronic Research and Evaluation, and Representation Technologies. If the 100-level and 200-level chemistry courses teach students essential spreadsheet skills, then all non-science majors and science majors who take those courses will have gained those skills. The more the TAC program can influence large and required courses, and the more other departments and courses become involved in the program, the more effective TAC becomes in achieving its goal of ensuring that all students receive training in the 10 crucial IT skills that provide the foundation and structure for the program.

The summary of the TAC Program by the Educause Award committee gives a good sense of what makes the program particularly effective. Two key words in that summary are "systematic" and "programmatic." The TAC Program is "systematic" in part because of the 10 overarching IT Goals. Those goals set up an ambitious range of skills for students to develop over their four years at GMU. When faculty members submit TAC proposals, the faculty members indicate the goals that those proposals are intended to satisfy. By means of the IT Grids and a project database, the TAC program tracks how many courses satisfy each of the 10 goals. The program also sets its own priorities for each funding cycle, choosing to concentrate on different goals over time based on the goals that need the most attention or that are most appropriate for that funding year. The overarching strategy is to integrate as many of those 10 skills into the curriculum over time as possible, so that by the time a student graduates from the university, s/he will have not only a broad-based liberal arts education, but also a good grounding in the technology skills needed for future success.

Unique characteristics of the program

  • a systematic process through which faculty identify core basic and advanced skills;
  • a grid matching these skills with programmatic curricular change;
  • a student-support mechanism (Student Technology Assistance and Resources) that provides students with basic instruction to prepare them for more advanced technical assignments;
  • a faculty-support mechanism (Instructional Resource Center) to help with redesign of courses, including a proposal process that reinforces explicit institutional needs;
  • a budget process that matches the priorities articulated in the TAC program;
  • solid assessment mechanisms.[7]
This exemplary program advances deliberate, institution-wide innovation while remaining grounded in both student needs and student achievement. It features a number of elements that would be useful to other institutions and state systems, including:

In June 2000, the TAC Program was selected as one of 20 international finalists in the Education Category of the Stockholm Challenge.[5] In October 2000, the TAC Program received the Governor's Technology Award in the Higher Education category.[6] In October 2001, the program received the annual Educause Systemic Progress in Teaching and Learning Award. The Educause Award articulates in a very clear way the essential elements of the TAC program:

Recognition and awards

One of the original creators of the program, Dee Ann Holisky, has overseen the program since its inception. As Associate Dean and Senior Associate Dean of the College of Arts and Sciences (now the College of Humanities and Social Sciences), she has also been responsible for overarching curriculum development for the college. The TAC Program is thus related to a general process of curriculum redesign, in which departments and faculty members rethink their course and program requirements to fulfill the college's mission of preparing students for their working lives and for citizenship in a complex, technology-rich society. Several TAC Coordinators have guided the program over its existence, including Jim Sparrow, Susan Warshauer, Leslie Harris, Beth Secrist, and Glenda Morgan.

You can find a history of the TAC-funded proposals on the TAC Project Summary Page. Over most of its history, the TAC program has funded proposals from faculty members modifying individual courses or a small group of courses to incorporate several of the skills listed among the TAC IT Goals. The program has also funded department-wide proposals, in which a department decides on a series of courses that will advance student technology skills in a deliberative way, as the student progresses through the program or major. Individual proposals often involved a one-year funding cycle, in which a faculty member (or a few faculty members) would design a new assignment that incorporated student technology skills, implement it during one or two semesters, and write a report back to the TAC program assessing the success of the project. Department-wide proposals often extended over multiple years, as a group of faculty members incorporated new assignments into a series of courses, providing interim and annual assessment reports for each year that the department received TAC funding. A good example of a department-wide project was the Technology in the NCC Curriculum project, in which several faculty in the New Century College developed a series of technology-based assignments, trained other NCC faculty in the use of those assignments, and described those assignments in a detailed online report. An example of a very ambitious, "individual" project is the U.S. History Online project, in which two faculty members developed a series of online modules for a particular course, teaching students how to think like historians and how to use various online sources and tools to interpret historical events and to analyze historical data. Individual TAC projects more typically involve a single assignment with clear, technology-based learning goals, advancing one or more of the 10 TAC IT goals.

Having articulated those goals, the TAC Program solicited faculty course and program development proposals that would incorporate one or more of the goals into particular course assignments, so that students would develop the skills associated with the various goals.

  1. Students will be able to engage in electronic collaboration.
  2. Students will be able to use and create structured electronic documents.
  3. Students will be able to do technology-enhanced presentations.
  4. Students will be able to use electronic tools for research and evaluation.
  5. Students will be able to use databases to manage information.
  6. Students will be able to use spreadsheets to manage information.
  7. Students will be able to use electronic tools for analyzing quantitative and qualitative data.
  8. Students will be able to use graphical and multimedia representation technologies.
  9. Students will be familiar with major legal, ethical, privacy and security issues in information technology.
  10. Students will have a working knowledge of hardware and software.

The Technology Across the Curriculum (TAC) program began in 1998 with funding from the governor and legislature of Virginia, along with additional funding from GMU itself.[3] After a series of consultations with faculty members about the technology skills that students need to succeed in majors and with local businesses and corporations about the skills they expect from graduates (in addition to discussions with students and with technology leaders), the creators of the program, Anne Scrivener Agee and Dee Ann Holisky, developed a series of IT goals that reflect the skills required by students to flourish in college and upon graduation. The goals, revised in fall 2001, are described in detail here. Thy are broken down into "essential" skills that all students should have (and that might be integrated into lower-division courses) and the "advanced" skills that might be relevant only to particular majors or to upper-level courses.[4] Those skills in brief are:

History and structure of the program

Contents

  • History and structure of the program 1
  • Recognition and awards 2
  • Unique characteristics of the program 3
  • References 4

[2][1]

This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
 
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
 
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.
 


Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.