World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

2/1 Game Forcing

Article Id: WHEBN0000098964
Reproduction Date:

Title: 2/1 Game Forcing  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Glossary of contract bridge terms, Bridge World Standard, Forcing notrump, Reverse (bridge), Precision Club
Collection:
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Publication
Date:
 

2/1 Game Forcing

2/1 game forcing (Two-over-one game forcing) is a bidding system in modern contract bridge structured around the following responses to a one-level opening bid:

  1. a non-jump response in a new suit at the one-level is constructive and forcing for one round,
  2. a non-jump response in a new suit at the two-level is forcing to game, and
  3. a 1NT response is forcing for one round and indicates insufficient values to immediately commit to game or bid a suit at the one-level.[1]

The 2/1 game force does not apply to responses by a passed hand, or if there is an intervening call by an opponent. Other responses are as per Standard American methods in accordance with partnership agreement.

Contents

  • Game forcing auctions 1
    • Variations 1.1
  • 1NT response 2
  • Other features 3
  • Examples 4
  • References 5
    • Notes 5.1
    • Bibliography 5.2

Game forcing auctions

The 2/1 auctions are: 1–2, 1–2, 1–2, 1–2, 1–2, and 1–2.

Variations

The following variations may be made by partnership agreement:

  • Some play that 1–2 is not game forcing
  • Some play that 2/1 is not absolutely game forcing and the pair can stop below game when responder rebids his suit. For example, 1–2; 2–3 may be treated as nonforcing.

1NT response

Because the two-level responses are stronger than in Standard American bidding, the response of 1NT is forcing for one round and is used (among other things) for weaker hands containing low-ranking suits. Since the 1NT response is forcing, hands with a three-card limit raise can start with 1NT and later jump-support partner. See Forcing notrump for additional details. Some pairs play a variant in which the 1NT response to 1 or 1 is semi-forcing.

Since opener has been forced to rebid on hands which he might otherwise have passed, he may have to rebid in a new suit with only three or even two cards.

Other features

Use of the 2/1 system usually implies (at least) the following additional agreements:

Examples

1 – 2
2 – 2
Forcing to game, with original spade support and good club suit. This is different from standard bidding, in which such a sequence would show about 10 points, and club suit could be semi-fake.

1 – 2
2 – 2NT.
Forcing to game, with balanced hand and a good club suit.

1 – 2
2 – 3
Forcing, unless the partnership has agreed that this is an exception to the "2/1 rule."

1 – 2
Forcing for one round only (as in Standard American), except in the variant of 2/1 where this sequence is game forcing as well.

1 – 2
Forcing for one round; 10 points or more with at least four clubs.

1 – 3
Weak; 9 points or less—sometimes much less—with at least five clubs.

1 – 2
Weak; 6-9 points with at least 3 hearts (unless Bergen raises are in use, in which case it shows precisely 3 hearts)

1 – 1NT;
2 – 2
Shows a weak hand, 6-9 points, with precisely two spades. Some also use this for an extremely weak hand (0-5) with three spades.

1 – 1NT;
2 – Pass
Shows a very weak hand, perhaps 5-7 points, with at least four clubs.

1 – 1NT;
2 – 2
Shows a weak hand, 5-9 points, with a long diamond suit.

1 – 1NT;
2 – 2
Shows a weak hand, 5-9 points, with a long heart suit.

1 – 1NT;
2 – 3
Shows a weak hand, 5-9 points, with a long club suit.

1 – 1NT;
2 – 2NT;
Shows 10-11 points without support for spades.

1 – 1NT;
2 – 3
Shows 10-11 points with 3-card support for spades.

1 – 3
Shows 10-11 points with at least 4-card support for spades.

1 – 1NT;
2 – 3
Shows 10-11 points with a long heart suit.

1 – 2
This is a jump response, and there are different ways of handling it. In Standard American, such a "jump shift" shows a very strong hand and is unequivocally forcing. However, since such hands do not occur with great frequency, it is more common today to use such a bid to show a weak hand with a long suit, unsuitable for defense. Another possibility is to play it as a "fit-showing jump", showing 8-10 points, a decent heart suit, and good diamond support.

References

Notes

  1. ^ Grant and Rodwell (2009), page 1.

Bibliography

  •  
  • Hardy, Max (2000). Standard Bridge Bidding for the 21st Century. SQueeZe Books.  
  • Hardy, Max (2002). Advanced Bridge Bidding for the 21st Century. SQueeZe Books.  
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
 
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
 
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.
 


Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.