World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Balancing (bridge)

Article Id: WHEBN0006186471
Reproduction Date:

Title: Balancing (bridge)  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Glossary of contract bridge terms, Bridge bidding, Balance, Snapdragon double, Stayman convention
Collection:
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Publication
Date:
 

Balancing (bridge)

In the game of contract bridge, balancing (or protection in Britain) refers to making a call other than Pass when passing would result in the opponents playing at a low level. Balancing is done by the player in the balancing position, i.e. to the right of the player making the last non-pass call. This is in contrast to bidding in the direct position, i.e. by the player to the left. Balancing is normally done with values unsuitable for direct action, but only after the opponents' bidding has demonstrated weakness or minimal strength. The aim of the tactic is to find a makeable or nearly-makeable contract for one's own side or to "push" opponents a level higher. It is more common in matchpoint games, where even a defeat and loss of 100 points is a relatively better result than the opponents' gain of 110-140 points.

Contents

  • Examples 1
    • After an opening bid is passed by responder 1.1
    • In later rounds 1.2
    • Balancing in direct seat 1.3
  • References 2
  • Further reading 3
  • External links 4

Examples

After an opening bid is passed by responder

Balancing situation result from sequences like:

West North East South
1 Pass Pass ?

Note that a Pass in this balancing position would result in defense against a 1 contract. The player in the balancing position, knows that the opener has made a non-forcing bid and that the opener's partner has denied values required to respond. In such a situation, it is probable that the opponents have less than half of the high-card strength. It is important to be able to enter the bidding on hands in which one has about 9-11 high card points (HCP). Therefore, in balancing position, either a takeout double or 1NT overcall can be made on less values than in direct position.

Mike Lawrence gave a detailed account of the various balancing situations in his Complete Book on Balancing in Contract Bridge. He stressed the fact that balancing over a minor suit is markedly different from balancing over a major suit. The difference stems from the fact that on a minor suit you can double and - after partner's response at 1-level - can rebid 1NT with 15-17 HCP. However, on a takeout double over a major suit, partner will seldom bid at the 1-level. As a result, the 1NT overcall over a major suit needs to be stronger.

The following summarises the balancing agreements made by competitive bridge players:
Balancing Over a Minor Suit Opening
West North East South (in the balancing position)
Call Meaning
1 Pass Pass Double 8+ HCP
1/ normal overcall
1NT 10-14 HCP, does not guarantee a stopper
2 normal overcall
2 unknown two-suiter (see Michaels cuebid)
2/ good 6+ card, 12-16 hcp
2NT 18-19 HCP, balanced
Balancing Over a Major Suit Opening
West North East South (in the balancing position)
Call Meaning
1 Pass Pass Double 8+ HCP
1 normal overcall
1NT 12-16 HCP, does not guarantee a stopper
2/ normal overcall
2 unknown two-suiter (see Michaels cuebid)
2 good 6+ card, 12-16 hcp
2NT 17-19 HCP, balanced

In later rounds

Balancing can be also executed in later rounds of bidding, in the sequences where the opponents have found a fit but stopped at a low-level. Normally, it is performed with some values, but less than if it was in direct seat. The opponents' fit requirement is important: statistically, existence of one side's 8+ cards fit favors the possibility that their opponents also have one (see Law of total tricks). Also, the opponents fit gives a clue to the partner's length in the suit, and, by inference from previous rounds of bidding, in other suits.
Bidding South Holding Comment
West North East South
1 Pass
2 Pass Pass ?
 J1084  8  A982  QJ63 South was too weak to give a takeout double in the first round, but the bidding now places some points with partner, and a likely fit in some suit
 KQ108  8532  A82  J6 South can now venture 2 overcall, judging that the partner has singleton heart and some values, so even a 4-3 fit could play well.
West North East South
1 Pass 1 Pass
2 Pass Pass ?
 108642  83  A98  QJ6 A hand too weak for initial overcall might now try a 2, as partner is marked with some values.
West North East South
1 Pass 1 Pass
2 Pass Pass ?
 10864  AJ6  98  KJ103 Although the distribution and strength are fine, opponents have not found a fit, and balancing can be dangerous; no fit from partner is implied, and East may have passed with significant values in fear of a misfit.
West North East South
1NT Pass 2 Pass
2 Pass Pass ?
^Jacoby transfer
 10864  5  KQ65  J1094 This is a fairly extreme case, but a takeout double might be ventured at matchpoints. The partner is marked with values which lie behind 1NT opener, although he might fail to provide a fit or expect more from the balancer and pass for penalties.

Balancing in direct seat

Although the "balancing in direct seat" term is self-contradictory, it is occasionally possible to have the "balancing values", yet to act relatively safely in the direct seat. The classic case[1] is after the opponents have found a fit at the two level:
Bidding South Holding Comment
West North East South
Pass
1 Pass 2 ?
 10963  8  A8532  KQ8 South can see that the partner is not short in hearts and is unlikely to balance over 2, so a takeout double is in order. A prior partnership agreement for light actions is in order.

It can also occur when the LHO has bid a sign-off without a clear fit, though this is not recommended due to the danger of not landing in a fit after the "pre balance".[1] The tactics/convention is often referred to as "OBAR BIDS" (acronym for "Opponents Bid And Raise - Balance In Direct Seat").

References

  1. ^ a b Larry Cohen, Balancing, Better Bridge, Vol. 9, No. 3.

Further reading

  • Mike Lawrence, The Complete Book on Balancing in Contract Bridge, 1st edition (1983), ISBN 0-939460-13-0

External links

  • Description of OBAR (Opponents Bid And Raise) Bids
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
 
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
 
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.
 


Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.