#jsDisabledContent { display:none; } My Account |  Register |  Help

# Discriminant of an algebraic number field

Article Id: WHEBN0003022963
Reproduction Date:

 Title: Discriminant of an algebraic number field Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia Language: English Subject: Collection: Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia Publication Date:

### Discriminant of an algebraic number field

A fundamental domain of the ring of integers of the field K obtained from Q by adjoining a root of x3 − x2 − 2x + 1. This fundamental domain sits inside K ⊗QR. The discriminant of K is 49 = 72. Accordingly, the volume of the fundamental domain is 7 and K is only ramified at 7.

In mathematics, the discriminant of an algebraic number field is a numerical invariant that, loosely speaking, measures the size of the (ring of integers of the) algebraic number field. More specifically, it is proportional to the volume of the fundamental domain of the ring of integers, and it regulates which primes are ramified.

The discriminant is one of the most basic invariants of a number field, and occurs in several important analytic formulas such as the functional equation of the Dedekind zeta function of K, and the analytic class number formula for K. An old theorem of Hermite states that there are only finitely many number fields of bounded discriminant, however determining this quantity is still an open problem, and the subject of current research.[1]

The discriminant of K can be referred to as the absolute discriminant of K to distinguish it from the relative discriminant of an extension K/L of number fields. The latter is an ideal in the ring of integers of L, and like the absolute discriminant it indicates which primes are ramified in K/L. It is a generalization of the absolute discriminant allowing for L to be bigger than Q; in fact, when L = Q, the relative discriminant of K/Q is the principal ideal of Z generated by the absolute discriminant of K.

## Contents

• Definition 1
• Examples 2
• Basic results 3
• History 4
• Relative discriminant 5
• Ramification 5.1
• Root discriminant 6
• Relation to other quantities 7
• Notes 8
• References 9
• Primary sources 9.1
• Secondary sources 9.2

## Definition

Let K be an algebraic number field, and let OK be its ring of integers. Let b1, ..., bn be an integral basis of OK (i.e. a basis as a Z-module), and let {σ1, ..., σn} be the set of embeddings of K into the complex numbers (i.e. injective ring homomorphisms K → C). The discriminant of K is the square of the determinant of the n by n matrix B whose (i,j)-entry is σi(bj). Symbolically,

\Delta_K=\left(\operatorname{det}\left(\begin{array}{cccc} \sigma_1(b_1) & \sigma_1(b_2) &\cdots & \sigma_1(b_n) \\ \sigma_2(b_1) & \ddots & & \vdots \\ \vdots & & \ddots & \vdots \\ \sigma_n(b_1) & \cdots & \cdots & \sigma_n(b_n) \end{array}\right)\right)^2.

Equivalently, the trace from K to Q can be used. Specifically, define the trace form to be the matrix whose (i,j)-entry is TrK/Q(bibj). This matrix equals BTB, so the discriminant of K is the determinant of this matrix.

## Examples

\Delta_K=\left\{\begin{array}{ll} d &\text{if }d\equiv 1\pmod 4 \\ 4d &\text{if }d\equiv 2,3\pmod 4. \\\end{array}\right.
An integer that occurs as the discriminant of a quadratic number field is called a fundamental discriminant.[3]
\Delta_{K_n} = (-1)^{\varphi(n)/2} \frac{n^{\varphi(n)}}{\displaystyle\prod_{p|n} p^{\varphi(n)/(p-1)}}
where \varphi(n) is Euler's totient function, and the product in the denominator is over primes p dividing n.
• Power bases: In the case where the ring of integers has a power integral basis, that is, can be written as OK = Z[α], the discriminant of K is equal to the discriminant of the minimal polynomial of α. To see this, one can chose the integral basis of OK to be b1 = 1, b2 = α, b3 = α2, ..., bn = αn−1. Then, the matrix in the definition is the Vandermonde matrix associated to αi = σi(α), whose determinant squared is
\prod_{1\leq i
which is exactly the definition of the discriminant of the minimal polynomial.
• Let K = Q(α) be the number field obtained by adjoining a root α of the polynomial x3 − x2 − 2x − 8. This is Richard Dedekind's original example of a number field whose ring of integers does not possess a power basis. An integral basis is given by {1, α, α(α + 1)/2} and the discriminant of K is −503.[5][6]
• Repeated discriminants: the discriminant of a quadratic field uniquely identifies it, but this is not true, in general, for higher-degree number fields. For example, there are two non-isomorphic cubic fields of discriminant 3969. They are obtained by adjoining a root of the polynomial x3 − 21x + 28 or x3 − 21x − 35, respectively.[7]

## Basic results

• Brill's theorem:[8] The sign of the discriminant is (−1)r2 where r2 is the number of complex places of K.[9]
• A prime p ramifies in K if, and only if, p divides ΔK .[10]
• Stickelberger's theorem:[11]
\Delta_K\equiv 0\text{ or }1 \pmod 4.
• Minkowski's bound:[12] Let n denote the degree of the extension K/Q and r2 the number of complex places of K, then
|\Delta_K|^{1/2}\geq \frac{n^n}{n!}\left(\frac{\pi}{4}\right)^{r_2} \geq \frac{n^n}{n!}\left(\frac{\pi}{4}\right)^{n/2}.
• Minkowski's theorem:[13] If K is not Q, then |ΔK| > 1 (this follows directly from the Minkowski bound).
• Hermite–Minkowski theorem:[14] Let N be a positive integer. There are only finitely many (up to isomorphisms) algebraic number fields K with |ΔK| < N. Again, this follows from the Minkowski bound together Hermite's theorem (There are only finitely many algebraic number fields with prescribed discriminant).

## History

Richard Dedekind showed that every number field possesses an integral basis, allowing him to define the discriminant of an arbitrary number field.[15]

The definition of the discriminant of a general algebraic number field, K, was given by Dedekind in 1871.[15] At this point, he already knew the relationship between the discriminant and ramification.[16]

Hermite's theorem predates the general definition of the discriminant with Charles Hermite publishing a proof of it in 1857.[17] In 1877, Alexander von Brill determined the sign of the discriminant.[18] Leopold Kronecker first stated Minkowski's theorem in 1882,[19] though the first proof was given by Hermann Minkowski in 1891.[20] In the same year, Minkowski published his bound on the discriminant.[21] Near the end of the nineteenth century, Ludwig Stickelberger obtained his theorem on the residue of the discriminant modulo four.[22][23]

## Relative discriminant

The discriminant defined above is sometimes referred to as the absolute discriminant of K to distinguish it from the relative discriminant ΔK/L of an extension of number fields K/L, which is an ideal in OL. The relative discriminant is defined in a fashion similar to the absolute discriminant, but must take into account that ideals in OL may not be principal and that there may not be an OL basis of OK. Let {σ1, ..., σn} be the set of embeddings of K into C which are the identity on L. If b1, ..., bn is any basis of K over L, let d(b1, ..., bn) be the square of the determinant of the n by n matrix whose (i,j)-entry is σi(bj). Then, the relative discriminant of K/L is the ideal generated by the d(b1, ..., bn) as {b1, ..., bn} varies over all integral bases of K/L. (i.e. bases with the property that bi ∈ OK for all i.) Alternatively, the relative discriminant of K/L is the norm of the different of K/L.[24] When L = Q, the relative discriminant ΔK/Q is the principal ideal of Z generated by the absolute discriminant ΔK . In a tower of fields K/L/F the relative discriminants are related by

\Delta_{K/F} = \mathcal{N}_{L/F}\left({\Delta_{K/L}}\right) \Delta_{L/F}^

where \mathcal{N} denotes relative norm.[25]

### Ramification

The relative discriminant regulates the ramification data of the field extension K/L. A prime ideal p of L ramifies in K if, and only if, it divides the relative discriminant ΔK/L. An extension is unramified if, and only if, the discriminant is the unit ideal.[24] The Minkowski bound above shows that there are no non-trivial unramified extensions of Q. Fields larger than Q may have unramified extensions, for example, for any field with class number greater than one, its Hilbert class field is a non-trivial unramified extension.

## Root discriminant

The root discriminant of a number field, K, of degree n, often denoted rdK, is defined as the n-th root of the absolute value of the (absolute) discriminant of K.[26] The relation between relative discriminants in a tower of fields shows that the root discriminant does not change in an unramified extension. The existence of a class field tower provides bounds on the root discriminant: the existence of an infinite class field tower over Q(√-m) where m = 3·5·7·11·19 shows that there are infinitely many fields with root discriminant 2√m ≈ 296.276.[27] If we let r and 2s be the number of real and complex embeddings, so that n = r + 2s, put ρ = r/n and σ = 2s/n. Set α(ρσ) to be the infimum of rdK for K with (r', 2s') = (ρnσn). We have (for all n large enough) [27]

\alpha(\rho,\sigma) \ge 60.8^\rho 22.3^\sigma

and on the assumption of the generalized Riemann hypothesis

\alpha(\rho,\sigma) \ge 215.3^\rho 44.7^\sigma .

So we have α(0,1) < 296.276. Martinet has shown α(0,1) < 93 and α(1,0) < 1059.[27][28] Voight 2008 proves that for totally real fields, the root discriminant is > 14, with 1229 exceptions.

## Relation to other quantities

• When embedded into K\otimes_\mathbf{Q}\mathbf{R}, the volume of the fundamental domain of OK is \sqrt{|\Delta_K|} (sometimes a different measure is used and the volume obtained is 2^{-r_2}\sqrt{|\Delta_K|}, where r2 is the number of complex places of K).
• Due to its appearance in this volume, the discriminant also appears in the functional equation of the Dedekind zeta function of K, and hence in the analytic class number formula, and the Brauer–Siegel theorem.
• The relative discriminant of K/L is the Artin conductor of the regular representation of the Galois group of K/L. This provides a relation to the Artin conductors of the characters of the Galois group of K/L, called the conductor-discriminant formula.[29]

## Notes

1. ^ Cohen, Diaz y Diaz & Olivier 2002
2. ^ a b
3. ^ Definition 5.1.2 of Cohen 1993
4. ^ Proposition 2.7 of Washington 1997
5. ^ Dedekind 1878, pp. 30–31
6. ^ Narkiewicz 2004, p. 64
7. ^ Cohen 1993, Theorem 6.4.6
8. ^ Koch 1997, p. 11
9. ^ Lemma 2.2 of Washington 1997
10. ^ Corollary III.2.12 of Neukirch 1999
11. ^ Exercise I.2.7 of Neukirch 1999
12. ^ Proposition III.2.14 of Neukirch 1999
13. ^ Theorem III.2.17 of Neukirch 1999
14. ^ Theorem III.2.16 of Neukirch 1999
15. ^ a b Dedekind's supplement X of the second edition of Peter Gustav Lejeune Dirichlet's Vorlesungen über Zahlentheorie (Dedekind 1871)
16. ^ Bourbaki 1994
17. ^ Hermite 1857.
18. ^ Brill 1877.
19. ^ Kronecker 1882.
20. ^ Minkowski 1891a.
21. ^ Minkowski 1891b.
22. ^ Stickelberger 1897.
23. ^ All facts in this paragraph can be found in Narkiewicz 2004, pp. 59, 81
24. ^ a b Neukirch 1999, §III.2
25. ^ Corollary III.2.10 of Neukirch 1999 or Proposition III.2.15 of Fröhlich & Taylor 1993
26. ^ Voight 2008
27. ^ a b c Koch 1997, pp. 181–182
28. ^
29. ^ Section 4.4 of Serre 1967