World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Fire in the Lake

Article Id: WHEBN0016055925
Reproduction Date:

Title: Fire in the Lake  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: So Human an Animal, O Strange New World, The Problem of Slavery in Western Culture, Wandering Through Winter, Stilwell and the American Experience in China, 1911–45
Collection:
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Publication
Date:
 

Fire in the Lake

Fire in the Lake: The Vietnamese and the Americans in Vietnam is a Pulitzer Prize winning book by the American journalist Frances FitzGerald (1940-) and published in 1972 by both Back Bay Publishing and Little, Brown and Company.[1][2]

Summary

The first major book by an American on America in Vietnam, which she calls a "first draft of history", it argues that American values of freedom, democracy, optimism, and technological progress were inconsistent with Vietnam's values, culture, agrarian economy, and long bloody history, making the Vietnam War effort doomed from the start. The Vietnamese sense of government, history, politics, and war is completely different from the American one, as is their cultural tradition of ancestor worship and their belief in what constitutes effective government (i.e. the mandate of Heaven), yet the U.S. government never took these differences into account, leading to failure. "But the American officials in supporting the Saigon government insisted that they were defending 'freedom and democracy' in Asia. They left the GIs to discover that the Vietnamese did not fit into their experience of either 'communist' or 'democrats.' Under different circumstances this invincible ignorance…" "Whatever strategy the American government uses to carry on the war, it will only be delaying the inevitable."

The book discusses the U.S. government's ignorance of Vietnam's history, especially their determination to rid themselves of any foreign invaders, even if, as with the Chinese, it took 1,000 years, making them unable to see themselves as just more foreign invaders to the populace. The U.S. tendency to support thugs over patriots, to elevate to power those who will sell out their people for money rather than work with those committed to the well-being of their people is brought out, as well as how Ho Chi Minh was a U.S. ally during WWII, his hero was Thomas Jefferson, he was very pro-American at first, yet he was a nationalist and a patriot first, which meant from the U.S. perspective that he was not only unreliable but someone who had to be eliminated, throwing him into the arms of the Red Chinese. If the U.S. had overlooked his storefront Communism, they might have sent U.S. troops not to help Vietnamese fight Vietnamese while Mao Tse-tung pulled the strings hoping for later absorption of the whole country, but to fight Chinese on the Chinese-Vietnam border, which could have lasted to this day.

Spending 90% of its text on the lead-up to the Tet Offensive, it covers several topics including the Cao Đài monotheist religious sect in Tay Ninh, the corrupt regime of Ngo Dinh Diem, and "Nixon's War".

In her discussion of the Battle of Bong Son, she discusses the futility of body counts:

"Furthermore, as the only 'indicator of progress,' it suggested that death and destruction had some absolute value in terms of winning the war. That the enemy might continue to recruit, rearm, and rebuild (often with the help of people enraged by the American destruction) did not seem to enter into the calculations."

The book is one of the first to expose the functions of the shanty towns built up around U.S. bases as laundry, drinks, and prostitution.

Critical reception

The book won several literary awards including the Pulitzer Prize for General Non-Fiction,[3] the National Book Award in Contemporary Affairs[4] and the Bancroft Prize.[5]

The book was criticized for trying to form a "grand Vietnamese Gestalt" which "ironically" argued that the West did not understand Vietnam while using Western thinkers as justification for this claim. [6]

References

  1. ^
  2. ^
  3. ^ "General Nonfiction". Past winners and finalists by category. The Pulitzer Prizes. Retrieved 2012-03-17.
  4. ^ .
    There was a "Contemporary" or "Current" award category from 1972 to 1980.
  5. ^
  6. ^

External links

This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
 
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
 
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.
 


Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.