World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Fortress Europe

Article Id: WHEBN0002179719
Reproduction Date:

Title: Fortress Europe  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Codevelopment, Co-development, No. 602 Squadron RAF, VIII Bomber Command, Specters of Marx
Collection: Historic Defensive Lines, Operation Overlord, World War II Defensive Lines, World War II Propaganda
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia

Fortress Europe

D-day assault map of Normandy and northwest coastal France

Fortress Europe (German: Festung Europa) was a military propaganda term from the Second World War which referred to the areas of Continental Europe occupied by Nazi Germany, as opposed to the United Kingdom across the Channel. The term was used by both sides but, due to their respective geographic locations, in a very different sense.

In British phraseology, Fortress Europe meant the battle honour accorded to Royal Air Force and Allied squadrons during the war, but to qualify, operations had to be made by aircraft based in Britain against targets in Germany, Italy and other parts of Nazi-occupied Europe, in the period from the fall of France to the Normandy invasion.


  • World War II defenses 1
  • Modern times 2
  • Controlled external borders 3
  • See also 4
  • References 5

World War II defenses

Simultaneously, the term Festung Europa was being used by Nazi propaganda, namely to refer to Axis powers at defending the continent from the Allies.

Modern times

Demonstration on November 2013 in Vienna from identitarian patriots for a Festung Europa and against Morten Kjærum.

Currently, within Europe, the most common use of the term is as a pejorative description of the state of immigration into the European Union. This can be in reference either to attitudes toward immigration, or to the system of border patrols and detention centers that are used to help prevent illegal immigration into the European Union.[1]

For conservative parties (e.g. the Freedom Party of Austria) 'Fortress Europe' is a positive term. They mostly claim that such a fortress does not really exist yet, and that illegal immigrants can enter Europe far too easily. They often charge the southern states with insufficient border control, claiming that the latter are acting on the knowledge that immigrants tend to be more attracted to western/northern states with more generous welfare systems (Switzerland, Germany, Austria, Sweden, etc.). Conservatives all over Europe want to end the Schengen Agreement and to re-install border controls because they say it did not only lead to mass migration of illegals but also to free traffic of criminals.[2] Changes in the Schengen treaties have come into effect in the wake of this criticism.[3]

The economist Anna Marie Mayda, analyzing [4] In his book "Germany Abolishes Itself," the prominent Social Democrat Thilo Sarrazin wrote that, "Whoever immigrates into Germany is taken care of regardless of their own initiative and readiness to achievement."[5] Findings show that German residents with immigrant backgrounds received social support payments at a rate equal 420% of that of native Germans.[6]

While the lower economic classes face stronger competition from the workers with relatively low qualifications who form the majority of the migration flow into Europe, a team of European economic researchers has drawn attention to the fact that concern about immigration is stronger among the economically well-to do, i.e. those who employ maids and eat out more frequently than the average consumer.[7]

Controlled external borders

See also

  • Hindenburg Line, German defences on the Western Front of World War I
  • Siegfried Line, German defences against France in World War II
  • Maginot Line, French defenses against Germany constructed for World War II
  • Iron Curtain, dividing line through Europe during the Cold War


  1. ^ Autonomous rear Entrances to Fortress Europe?!
  2. ^
  3. ^
  4. ^ Mayda, Anna Marie. "International Migration: A Panel Data Analysis of the Determinants of Bilateral Flows." Journal of Population Economics. 3.24 (2007): p. 1249-74.
  5. ^ Sarrazin, Deutschland schafft sich ab, 1. Aufl., München 2010, p. 321.
  6. ^ Bender, Stefan and Seifert, Wolfgang. "Introduction." Immigration, Citizenship and the Welfare State in Germany and the US. Ed. Hermann Kurthen, Jürgen Fijalkowski and Gert G. Wagner. Stanford, Connecticut: JAI Press Inc, 1998. p. 3. Print.
  7. ^ Brücker, Herbert, et al.. "Economic Consequences of Immigration in Europe" Immigration and the Transformation of Europe. Comp. Craig A. Parsons, Timothy M. Smeeding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. p. 133. Print.
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.