 #jsDisabledContent { display:none; } My Account | Register | Help Flag as Inappropriate This article will be permanently flagged as inappropriate and made unaccessible to everyone. Are you certain this article is inappropriate?          Excessive Violence          Sexual Content          Political / Social Email this Article Email Address:

Marginal likelihood

Article Id: WHEBN0000979771
Reproduction Date:

 Title: Marginal likelihood Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia Language: English Subject: Collection: Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia Publication Date:

Marginal likelihood

In statistics, a marginal likelihood function, or integrated likelihood, is a likelihood function in which some parameter variables have been marginalized. In the context of Bayesian statistics, it may also be referred to as the evidence or model evidence.

Given a set of independent identically distributed data points \mathbb{X}=(x_1,\ldots,x_n), where x_i \sim p(x_i|\theta) according to some probability distribution parameterized by θ, where θ itself is a random variable described by a distribution, i.e. \theta \sim p(\theta|\alpha), the marginal likelihood in general asks what the probability p(\mathbb{X}|\alpha) is, where θ has been marginalized out (integrated out):

p(\mathbb{X}|\alpha) = \int_\theta p(\mathbb{X}|\theta) \, p(\theta|\alpha)\ \operatorname{d}\!\theta

The above definition is phrased in the context of Bayesian statistics. In classical (frequentist) statistics, the concept of marginal likelihood occurs instead in the context of a joint parameter θ=(ψ,λ), where ψ is the actual parameter of interest, and λ is a non-interesting nuisance parameter. If there exists a probability distribution for λ, it is often desirable to consider the likelihood function only in terms of ψ, by marginalizing out λ:

\mathcal{L}(\psi;\mathbb{X}) = p(\mathbb{X}|\psi) = \int_\lambda p(\mathbb{X}|\psi,\lambda) \, p(\lambda|\psi) \ \operatorname{d}\!\lambda

Unfortunately, marginal likelihoods are generally difficult to compute. Exact solutions are known for a small class of distributions, particularly when the marginalized-out parameter is the conjugate prior of the distribution of the data. In other cases, some kind of numerical integration method is needed, either a general method such as Gaussian integration or a Monte Carlo method, or a method specialized to statistical problems such as the Laplace approximation, Gibbs sampling or the EM algorithm.

It is also possible to apply the above considerations to a single random variable (data point) x, rather than a set of observations. In a Bayesian context, this is equivalent to the prior predictive distribution of a data point.

Contents

• Applications 1
• Bayesian model comparison 1.1
• References 3

Applications

Bayesian model comparison

In Bayesian model comparison, the marginalized variables are parameters for a particular type of model, and the remaining variable is the identity of the model itself. In this case, the marginalized likelihood is the probability of the data given the model type, not assuming any particular model parameters. Writing θ for the model parameters, the marginal likelihood for the model M is

p(x|M) = \int p(x|\theta, M) \, p(\theta|M) \, \operatorname{d}\!\theta

It is in this context that the term model evidence is normally used. This quantity is important because the posterior odds ratio for a model M1 against another model M2 involves a ratio of marginal likelihoods, the so-called Bayes factor:

\frac{p(M_1|x)}{p(M_2|x)} = \frac{p(M_1)}{p(M_2)} \, \frac{p(x|M_1)}{p(x|M_2)}

which can be stated schematically as

posterior odds = prior odds × Bayes factor