World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Retrocession Day

 

Retrocession Day

Taiwan Retrocession Day
臺灣光復節
Observed by Taiwan,  Republic of China
Type Historical, cultural, nationalist
Date 25 October 1945
Frequency annual

Taiwan Retrocession Day (Chinese: 臺灣光復節; pinyin: Taiwan guāngfùjié) is an annual observance and unofficial holiday in Taiwan to commemorate the end of 50 years of Japanese rule of the island and its handover to the Republic of China on October 25, 1945.[1][2]

Contents

  • Historical background 1
  • Disputes 2
  • Taiwan independence viewpoint 3
  • Gallery of images 4
  • See also 5
  • References 6
  • External links 7

Historical background

Taiwan, then more commonly known to the Western world as "Formosa", became a colony of the Empire of Japan when the Qing Empire lost the First Sino-Japanese War in 1894 and ceded the island with the signing of the 1895 Treaty of Shimonoseki. Japanese rule in Taiwan lasted until the end of World War II.

In November 1943, Chiang Kai-Shek took part in the Cairo Conference in Cairo, Kingdom of Egypt with American, British and Chinese leaders, who firmly advocated that Japan be required to return all of the territory it had annexed into its empire, including Taiwan and the Penghu Islands. Article 8 of the Potsdam Proclamation, drafted by the United States, United Kingdom, Soviet Union and China in July 1945, reiterated that the provisions of the Cairo Declaration be thoroughly carried out, and the Japanese Instrument of Surrender stated Japan's agreement to the terms of the Potsdam Proclamation.

Under the authorisation of Taiwan Province. Taiwan has since been governed by the Republic of China, and since 1949 has made up most of the country's territory, along with Kinmen, Matsu, Penghu, and other nearby islands, and now is usually referred to as Taiwan.

Disputes

Secretary of State of the United States Dean Acheson said on 5th January, 1950: "The Chinese have administered Formosa for four years. Neither the United States nor any other ally ever questioned that authority in that occupation. When Formosa was made a province of China nobody raised any lawyer's doubts about that. That was regarded as in accordance with the commitments. Now, in the opinion of some, the situation has changed. They want to say,' Well we have to wait for the treaty.' We did not wait for a treaty on Cairo. We did not wait for a treaty on the Kuriles. We did not wait for a treaty on the islands over which we have trusteeship."[3] In a lengthy legal essay published in Tokyo in 1972, Chairman Huang Zhaotang, World United Formosans for Independence, analysed the British Parliamentary records and other documents, concluding that the legal status of Taiwan was undetermined.[4] Writing in the American Journal of International Law in July 2000, Jonathan I. Charney and J. R. V. Prescott maintained that the Chinese Nationalists (ROC) began a military occupation of Taiwan in 1945 as a result of Japan's surrender,[5] and that none of the post-World War II peace treaties explicitly ceded sovereignty over Formosa and the Pescadores to any specific state or government.[6] The official position of both the People's Republic of China and the Republic of China are that Taiwan and Penghu were returned to the Republic of China according to the terms of the 1945 Japanese Instrument of Surrender, which stipulated Japan's compliance with the terms of the Potsdam Declaration. The Potsdam Declaration in turn included the terms of the Cairo Declaration, which required Japan to return all conquered territories to China, including Taiwan and the Pescadores.[7]

Retrocession Day is currently not an official Democratic Progressive Party, which rejects the idea of Taiwan being taken back by China, downplayed the event during their two terms of presidency from 2000 to 2008.[8][9] In 2010, small scale memorials were held by the Taipei City Government to commemorate the 65th Anniversary of Retrocession.[10]

Taiwan independence viewpoint

Supporters of Taiwan independence have argued that Taiwanese retrocession was invalid since there is no precedent in international law in which an instrument of surrender effected a transfer of sovereignty, and they base their belief in part on both a declassified CIA report from March 1949 confirming that Taiwan was not a part of the Republic of China[11] and President Truman's June 27, 1950 statement regarding Taiwan's "undetermined status," which they hold as proof of the leading Allies' views. As late as November 1950, the US State Dept. announced that no formal act restoring sovereignty over Formosa and the Pescadores to China had yet occurred; . . .[12] British officials reiterated this viewpoint in 1955, saying that "The Chinese Nationalists began a military occupation of Formosa and the Pescadores in 1945. However, these areas were under Japanese sovereignty until 1952."[3]

Gallery of images

See also

References

  1. ^ "Taiwan's retrocession procedurally clear: Ma". The China Post. CNA. 2010-10-26. Retrieved 2014-05-28. 
  2. ^ Huang, Tai-lin (2014-05-22). "Lien's campaign TV ads to stress love for Taiwan". Taipei Times. Retrieved 2014-05-28. 
  3. ^ a b Far East (Formosa and the Pescadores),  
  4. ^  
  5. ^ Charney, Jonathan I.; Prescott, J. R. V. (July 2000). "Resolving Cross-Strait Relations between China and Taiwan". The American Journal of International Law 94 (3): 453.  
  6. ^ Charney & Prescott (2000).
  7. ^ Hung, Joe (December 7, 2009). "Chen's shadow is getting eclipsed". China Post. 
  8. ^ Chung, Lawrence (26 October 2000). "Taipei govt downplays Retrocession Day". The Straits Times. 
  9. ^ Hirsch, Max (26 October 2006). "Activists call for Retrocession Day national vacation". Taipei Times. 
  10. ^ Ma, Ying-jeou (22 December 2010). "A Word from the President". Exhibition Commemorating the 65th Anniversary of Victory in the War of Resistance Against Japan and the Retrocession of Taiwan.  
  11. ^ Lowther, William (June 9, 2013). "CIA report shows Taiwan concerns". Taipei Times. Archived from the original on 2013-07-13. Retrieved 2013-06-10. [Quoting from a declassified CIA report on Taiwan written in March 1949] From the legal standpoint, Taiwan is not part of the Republic of China. Pending a Japanese peace treaty, the island remains occupied territory in which the US has proprietary interests. 
  12. ^ United States Dept of State (Nov 11, 1950). "Sec. of State (Acheson) to Sec. of Defense (Marshall)".  

External links

  • Taiwan's Retrocession Day on the Government Information Office website of Taiwan
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
 
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
 
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.
 


Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.