World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Xtea

Article Id: WHEBN0000530334
Reproduction Date:

Title: Xtea  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Tiny Encryption Algorithm, XXTEA, WikiProject Cryptography, Roger Needham, Impossible differential cryptanalysis
Collection: Articles with Example C Code, Feistel Ciphers, Free Ciphers
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Publication
Date:
 

Xtea

XTEA
Two Feistel rounds (one cycle) of XTEA
General
Designers Roger Needham, David Wheeler
First published 1997
Derived from TEA
Successors Corrected Block TEA
Cipher detail
Key sizes 128 bits
Block sizes 64 bits
Structure Feistel cipher
Rounds variable; recommended 64 Feistel rounds (32 cycles)
Best public cryptanalysis
A related-key rectangle attack on 36 rounds of XTEA (Lu, 2009)

In cryptography, XTEA (eXtended TEA) is a block cipher designed to correct weaknesses in TEA. The cipher's designers were David Wheeler and Roger Needham of the Cambridge Computer Laboratory, and the algorithm was presented in an unpublished technical report in 1997 (Needham and Wheeler, 1997). It is not subject to any patents.

Like TEA, XTEA is a 64-bit block Feistel cipher with a 128-bit key and a suggested 64 rounds. Several differences from TEA are apparent, including a somewhat more complex key-schedule and a rearrangement of the shifts, XORs, and additions.

Presented along with XTEA was a variable-width block cipher termed Block TEA, which uses the XTEA round function, but Block TEA applies it cyclically across an entire message for several iterations. Because it operates on the entire message, Block TEA has the property that it does not need a mode of operation. An attack on the full Block TEA was described in (Saarinen, 1998), which also details a weakness in Block TEA's successor, XXTEA.

In 2004, Ko et al. presented a related-key differential attack on 27 out of 64 rounds of XTEA, requiring 220.5 chosen plaintexts and a time complexity of 2115.15 (Ko et al., 2004).

In 2009, Lu presented a related-key rectangle attack on 36 rounds of XTEA, breaking more rounds than any previously published cryptanalytic results for XTEA.

Contents

  • Implementations 1
  • See also 2
  • References 3
  • External links 4

Implementations

This standard C source code, adapted from the reference code released into the public domain by David Wheeler and Roger Needham, encrypts and decrypts using XTEA:

#include 

/* take 64 bits of data in v[0] and v[1] and 128 bits of key[0] - key[3] */

void encipher(unsigned int num_rounds, uint32_t v[2], uint32_t const key[4]) {
    unsigned int i;
    uint32_t v0=v[0], v1=v[1], sum=0, delta=0x9E3779B9;
    for (i=0; i < num_rounds; i++) {
        v0 += (((v1 << 4) ^ (v1 >> 5)) + v1) ^ (sum + key[sum & 3]);
        sum += delta;
        v1 += (((v0 << 4) ^ (v0 >> 5)) + v0) ^ (sum + key[(sum>>11) & 3]);
    }
    v[0]=v0; v[1]=v1;
}

void decipher(unsigned int num_rounds, uint32_t v[2], uint32_t const key[4]) {
    unsigned int i;
    uint32_t v0=v[0], v1=v[1], delta=0x9E3779B9, sum=delta*num_rounds;
    for (i=0; i < num_rounds; i++) {
        v1 -= (((v0 << 4) ^ (v0 >> 5)) + v0) ^ (sum + key[(sum>>11) & 3]);
        sum -= delta;
        v0 -= (((v1 << 4) ^ (v1 >> 5)) + v1) ^ (sum + key[sum & 3]);
    }
    v[0]=v0; v[1]=v1;
}

The changes from the reference source code are minor:

  • The reference source code used the unsigned long type rather than the 64-bit clean uint32_t.
  • The reference source code did not use const types.
  • The reference source code omitted redundant parentheses, using C precedence to write the round function as e.g. v1 += (v0<<4 ^ v0>>5) + v0 ^ sum + k[sum>>11 & 3];

The recommended value for the "num_rounds" parameter is 32, not 64, as each iteration of the loop does two Feistel-cipher rounds. To additionally improve speed, the loop can be unrolled by pre-computing the values of sum+key[].

See also

  • RC4 — A stream cipher that, just like XTEA, is designed to be very simple to implement.
  • XXTEA — Block TEA's successor.
  • TEA — Block TEA's precursor.

References

  • Gautham Sekar, Nicky Mouha, Vesselin Velichkov, and Bart Preneel. "Meet-in-the-Middle Attacks on Reduced-Round XTEA." In Proceedings of CT-RSA 2011, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 6558: 250-267. Springer-Verlag.
  • Youngdai Ko, Seokhie Hong, Wonil Lee, Sangjin Lee, and Jongin Lim. "Related key differential attacks on 27 rounds of XTEA and full rounds of GOST." In Proceedings of FSE '04, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2004. Springer-Verlag.
  • Seokhie Hong, Deukjo Hong, Youngdai Ko, Donghoon Chang, Wonil Lee, and Sangjin Lee. "Differential cryptanalysis of TEA and XTEA." In Proceedings of ICISC 2003, 2003b.
  • Dukjae Moon, Kyungdeok Hwang, Wonil Lee, Sangjin Lee, and Jongin Lim. "Impossible differential cryptanalysis of reduced round XTEA and TEA." Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2365: 49-60, 2002. ISSN 0302-9743.
  • Roger M. Needham and David J. Wheeler. "Tea extensions." Technical report, Computer Laboratory, University of Cambridge, October 1997.
  • Vikram Reddy Andem. "A Cryptanalysis of the Tiny Encryption Algorithm", Masters thesis, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, 2003.
  • Markku-Juhani Saarinen. Cryptanalysis of Block TEA. Unpublished manuscript, October 1998.
  • Lu, Jiqiang (January 2009), "Related-key rectangle attack on 36 rounds of the XTEA block cipher" (PDF), International Journal of Information Security 8 (1): 1–11,  

External links

  • A web page advocating TEA and XTEA and providing a variety of implementations
  • Test vectors for TEA and XTEA
  • A Cryptanalysis of the Tiny Encryption Algorithm
  • A C implementation of XTEA
  • PHP implementation of XTEA
  • Pascal/Delphi implementation of XTEA
  • Java implementation of XTEA (32 rounds)
  • JavaScript implementation of XTEA (32 rounds)
  • Python implementation of XTEA
  • Linden Scripting Language (LSL) implementation of XTEA for Second Life scripting
  • Verilog implementation of XTEA
  • Smalltalk implementation of XTEA
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
 
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
 
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.
 


Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.